Mail Archive Search: <+from:W6FFH@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:W6FFH@aol.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] LCD Monitors (OT) (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:21:34 EST; LCD for or I got a ViewSonic 15 inch LCD monitor from Office Depot here in CA about 8 months ago. I like it a lot, easier to see for my old eyes. The main reason for getting it was that the two CRT t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00112.html (8,055 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] wh7k is Hawaii (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 16:50:10 EST; I'd like to know too, desperately. Don W6FFH e-mail w6ffh@aol.com -- WWW: http://www.writelog.com/ Submissions: writelog@contesting.com Administrative requests: writelog-REQUEST@contesting.com Proble; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00109.html (7,057 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Serial Numbers (again) (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:40:19 EST; I had to quit the 10mtr contest early, but had enough Q's to spot more serial number problems. I used version 10.22b. 1. Skipped no. 6. (i.e. 4,5,7,8....) 2. Got two number 50's. Possible clue: Had l; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00110.html (7,628 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] wh7k is Hawaii (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 20:00:05 EST; Ron - Did that (should have known it), that corrected Kure to Hawaii, but still gave me a new mult. Had two previous Hawaii contacts. Tried the "Recalculate Score" but that didn't change it. Don't be; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-12/msg00114.html (7,549 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] Packet spots (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 13:56:22 EST; << I've come to the conclusion that trying to make a good Search & Pounce effort is really counteracted by the packet spot window - it's just too tempting to rely on the spots for working all new sta; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00025.html (11,031 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] Packet spots (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 17:56:55 EST; << Don,.. we agree ....it can be very frustrating .... But think about it ...... do you really think most contesters would agree to go backward ..... It is like saying we all should be using hand key; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00031.html (9,007 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] CQWW Log Sumit Question? (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 19:19:26 EST; << I just sent my log for the CQWW SSB contest in. I was under the impression that we only had to send in the Cabrillo File and no Summary sheet. This is what it says in the rules: E-MAIL Required Co; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00060.html (8,356 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] Writelog RTTY receiver (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:38:32 EST; Hi Jeff - I lost your message regarding the dissapearing RTTY receiver window, so can't copy it back. You wrote "how do I keep Writelog RTTY receiver window on my screen? I think you've got the old w; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00194.html (7,209 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] Writelog RTTY receiver - 2 (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 19:54:47 EST; Jeff - I forgot to mention r.e. the dissapearing RTTY Rx window, it doesn't go away, it's just minimized and appears as a button on your taskbar like any other program you minimize. The reason is tha; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-11/msg00195.html (6,874 bytes)
10. [WriteLog] Networking (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 16:40:32 EDT; This is a simple(minded?) question that probably has a lot of answers, but here goes. I'd like to get a few inputs from those with networked computers, what, in their opinion is simplest and easiest; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00060.html (6,881 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] Still need help with summary report (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 22:40:39 EDT; << I would like to thank all the replies that I received, it was much better that my first effort to get an answer to this problem, but I still can not create a summary report, I fail to mention in m; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00090.html (9,993 bytes)
12. [WriteLog] R.E. PSL31 Observations in CCCC (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:14:57 EDT; Just read some comments, might as well add my own. The last one I read wanted a waterfall display, I was a waterfall fan also a while back, but have since started to prefer the "wiggly line" display.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00017.html (7,365 bytes)
13. [WriteLog] CQ WW RTTY comments/question (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:29:28 EDT; This contest was my first RTTY test, in fact my first RTTY contact ever was No. 001!! Had a ball, the only real problem with WL was the highlighting of calls going to la-la land for a while and then; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00206.html (8,646 bytes)
14. [WriteLog] CQ WW RTTY comments/question (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:13:57 EDT; To John, WA9ALS: Thanks John, you caught me! You're absolutely right, I did indeed use the TxD line for FSK, not RTS as I wrote. I was looking at the schematic I had marked up to remove the source of; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00209.html (6,950 bytes)
15. [WriteLog] Re: Tuning Upgrade for FT1000D (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 02:14:47 EDT; Thanks Bruce (WT4I) for the website address for tuning upgrade. I hope N3ND also saw it. I assume it's the same as the blurb I saw in QST, July 1994 issue by International Radio and Computer as it wa; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00210.html (7,251 bytes)
16. [WriteLog] Tuning Upgrade for FT1000D (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 15:02:52 EDT; To: Dan N3ND Didn't get ur e-mail address so am sending to reflector. May be others that are interested in finer tuning for the FT1000D. The website address that I got from WT4I was: http://www.qth.c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-09/msg00215.html (7,413 bytes)
17. [WriteLog] 0pto Isolators - again (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:12:43 EDT; Hi All - I'm finally getting around to hooking up RTTY FSK to my FT1000D using optocouplers. Remembering all the comments on how hard the 4N33's were to find, and substitutes like 4N32 were O.K., I t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-08/msg00113.html (7,204 bytes)
18. [WriteLog] Rttywrite Windows (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 20:12:42 EDT; They say there's no such thing as a dumb question - so, here goes. Why do the Rttywrite and RTTY Receiver windows get minimized when you click the mouse anywhere on the WL screen (log window, QSO ent; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-08/msg00162.html (7,027 bytes)
19. [WriteLog] Rttywrite Windows (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:28:56 EDT; I'd like to thank Don, AA5AU, Bruce, W1CSM and John, WA9ALS for responding to my question r.e. why Rttywrite windows disappear when mouse is clicked on WL main windows. All three were right on the mo; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-08/msg00167.html (8,791 bytes)
20. [WriteLog] RTTY Recieve Problem (score: 1): Author: W6FFH@aol.com (W6FFH@aol.com); Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:29:49 EDT; This is my first letter to the reflector, though I have been monitoring all mail since February. In all that time, I have not been able to receive RTTY no matter how hard I try. I have seen replies t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-07/msg00132.html (7,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]