Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+question\s+about\s+portable\s+operator\s+class\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "David Ashworth" <fathom@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:42:39 -0000
Hello, been reading the rules for the September VHF contest and the "general rules for contests above 50 MHz". It brings up a couple of questions. It doesn't look like you would get extra points for
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00042.html (7,078 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Hi David, You can do either of the scenarios you mentioned as a portable op. I've been operating QRP Portable in VHF contests for quite a few years now. In my case, I stuff equipment for 10 bands int
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00043.html (8,769 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swiderski, KU4BP" <ku4bp@triad.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:05:16 -0400
Either is OK. I just got into VHF contesting last year and have run only portable. I pack my stuff in my truck and head to my favorite spot. Set up the antenna(s), connect the radio to my battery, tu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00045.html (9,009 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:12:12 -0700
David, I have operated this class a lot. The rules prohibit the use of the home station and limit you to 10W. This puts the emphasis on antennas and location, location, location. Since I live in a ho
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00046.html (9,034 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: J999w@aol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:23:58 EDT
<< From reading the rules, looks like 10 watts PEP or less, portable power source and portable antennas = portable operator class. Unless you're out to win a plaque I'd run all the power you can. Go
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00047.html (7,863 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 15:43:59 -0500
A friend of mine, W4RXR, made several contacts recently in the ARRL UHF Contest. He took a big battery from a UPS(122 amp./hr.), an IC-402, a Mirage 100 watt amp, and a homebrew 13-el. beam at 15 fee
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00048.html (9,016 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: J999w@aol.com
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 17:25:19 EDT
<< The 100 watts is the key,plus location and antenna gain.Find a bald hill with no trees! Joe W4AAB >> Agreed. A few years ago, we did a few portable operations from the roof of a 26 floor building.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00049.html (7,836 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: Bob Witte K0NR <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:13:28 -0600
It depends on your objective and personal preferences. I agree that having 100W (or more!) will get you more contacts and grids. On the other hand, I've had a really good time doing the QRP (I mean,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00050.html (9,762 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Embry (K3OQ)" <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:42:06 -0400
I would love to see a QRP category for home stations. This is the way I operated the last two years. Having played rover for a couple of times, I don't have the inclination nor desire to do the porta
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00051.html (10,876 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swiderski, KU4BP" <ku4bp@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:01:18 -0400
Like I said earlier, I've just got into VHF contesting last year. I like the portable operation. After years of HF contesting and Dxing in a confined shack, operating outside is a real breath of fres
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00052.html (12,188 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: curtis roseman <croseman@usc.edu>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:19:08 -0500
Gentlemen: I agree with K0NR regarding the goals of running QRP. It can be fun, challenging, adventurous, economical, and a lot of other things. I would not support a QRP category for home stations i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00054.html (12,383 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: Bob Witte K0NR <list@k0nr.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:40:14 -0600
It is worth noting that the CQ WW VHF Contest has a slightly different approach to QRP entry categories: Single-Op All-Band QRP. There are no location restrictions home or portable for stations runni
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00055.html (11,105 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "crawfish" <crawfish@surfmore.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:51 -0500
Curt has a point. It is possible to put up enough stacked antennas with a QRP station that his footprint would be equal (or near to) a station at the 150 watt level, therefore, his capability COULD b
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00056.html (14,115 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Embry (K3OQ)" <jeffrey.embry@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:00:34 -0400
Curtis, Truth be told, I really don't care whether they do or not have a QRP category in ARRL contests for home stations. I am sure there are also cost involved in adding categories. I chose to run Q
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00057.html (10,628 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu