Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+bands\s+are\s+dead\s+\!\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+bands\s+are\s+dead\s+\!\!\!\!\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: WB4UNA@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:45:41 EST; not much going on around here. bands are dead..made a few contacts and that has been it...still looking .... Randy WB4UNA since 1970 Carlus M. Randy Chavis 432 thru hf bands **Start the year off righ; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00153.html (6,556 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: "Ellen Rugowski" <ellenjoanne2003@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:34:31 -0600; You have that right. These have to be some of the worst condx. I've ever dealt with in the VHF SS (and that includes some where the temps were below zero, like they've been during this one). 73, Elle; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00155.html (8,419 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:50:02 -0600 (CST); I didn't get much operating time yesterday due to other things going on. The bands were pretty dead with only one station worked (on 144, 222 and 432). I just had to go out and see a couple bands pla; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00156.html (8,178 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: "Ellen Rugowski" <ellenjoanne2003@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:26:34 -0600; Yeah, it's been like that here, Other than the K9NS superstation on 6 & 2m (I'm having issues with the 432 rig), just south of the WI/IL state line (I'm in the Milwaukee area) all I've worked are a c; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00157.html (9,596 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: "Joe Serocki" <joeserocki@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:31:45 -0600; This was pretty insane. There was no one of the bands from EN54/64 last night, I had hopes of some contacts there so people could work those squares! K9NS is great! I have never heard such a clean, s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00158.html (10,748 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: George Sintchak/WA2VNV <wa2vnv@optonline.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:52:54 -0500; Ellen, you forgot to mention the Green Bay factor into ur lack of stations. I'm from Long Island NY (FN30) but have a son who lives in Madison, WI and he tells me that when there's a Packers game eve; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00160.html (11,178 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: "Ellen Rugowski" <ellenjoanne2003@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:12:53 -0600; Very True George, But the bands were even dead on Saturday night (which is typically when I see the most activity in VHF contests). 73, Ellen - AF9J stations. suspects my last though. ever and ______; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00162.html (12,628 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:32:06 -0600 (CST); I usually see the most activity during the last few hours of the contest when a few ops get on after dinner on Sunday to give out a few QSO's, even though not particularly into the contest. It was pr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00163.html (14,369 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] bands are dead !!!! (score: 1): Author: Ellen Rugowski <ellenjoanne2003@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:51:03 -0800 (PST); Bummer! I lost a huge amount of time on Sunday. My friend had car trouble, so just as I was starting up gain on Sunday, I had to stop everything to make a 260 mile round trip to help her out with her; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00172.html (14,444 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]