- 1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Two Bands (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
- I asked the folks at CQ why 222Mhz was excluded from their VHF contest. The response was that since it is a Worldwide Contest and 222 is only an amateur band in the U.S. they couldn't include it. I'm
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00206.html (7,247 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Two Bands (score: 1)
- Author: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@lcisp.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 01:06:25 -0000
- No, CQ screwed up also, because 222mhz is not just a US ham band. It is a ham band in all of region 2 (North and South America) so it is an international band. There are also countries that don't hav
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00207.html (8,688 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Two Bands (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
- Maybe both CQ and the ARRL should keep it simple.....any VHF band, any UHF band, any band above UHF or change the names of their contests John Geiger <aa5jg@lcisp.com> wrote: No, CQ screwed up also,
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00209.html (9,377 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Two Bands (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:15:31 -0700 (PDT)
- You guys kill me. Nobody screwed up. And CQ kept it real simple. Good for them. K7CW http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontest
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00211.html (10,444 bytes)
- 5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Two Bands (score: 1)
- Author: "Eric Smith" <kb7dqh@donobi.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:14:07 -0700
- Hmmmmm.... This is first VHF contest I ever really participated in, from start to finish. I went out to a local mountaintop with a barefoot Icom 202 and a Cushcraft 11 element Yagi, and had an absolu
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00212.html (8,330 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu