Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Transverter\s+for\s+446\s+FM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Transverter\s+for\s+446\s+FM\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Transverter for 446 FM (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rogers - K2TER" <k2ter@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:45:31 -0500; Season's Greeting! I am completing integration of ANAN-10's SDR as IF rigs for my rover. I have to say I am quite happy with the simplified and integrated operating experience for contesting this arr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-12/msg00013.html (7,390 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverter for 446 FM (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 07:05:27 -0600; On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Bill Rogers - K2TER While I understand and support the sentiment to reduce the number of rigs would't adding a mono-band or even dual band mobile rig to the mix be a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-12/msg00014.html (7,978 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverter for 446 FM (score: 1): Author: "Terry Price" <w8zn54@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:24:14 -0500; I would seriously consider a VHF ApolLO from DEMI, it gives you many variations to play with to find one where there are no birdies. Using the LO scheme of 435 - 26, 27, 28, 29 would put 446 at 47, 4; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-12/msg00015.html (9,792 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverter for 446 FM (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rogers - K2TER" <k2ter@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:04:40 -0500; Mike et al, We currently have one of our FT-736Rs performing that function (446 FM) dedicated rig. We always keep this 4 band unit in the rover just in case... We find that we do flurries of mixed op; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-12/msg00016.html (10,764 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Transverter for 446 FM (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rogers - K2TER" <k2ter@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:32:22 -0500; Terry, That's a fantastic suggestion. Thanks! I hadn't thought to look at the ApolLO. 435-26 seems to be the right documented setting, as you stated. That would place the IF at 37 for 446. I wonder i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-12/msg00017.html (11,394 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]