Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+SteppIR\'s\s+on\s+6m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+SteppIR\'s\s+on\s+6m\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] SteppIR's on 6m (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <doug@k4ac.com>; Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 21:49:45 -0400; Is anyone using a SteppIR antenna for contesting on 6m? In order to add microwave bands to the tower, I need to consolidate some antennas. I've got an 8 element Cushcraft log periodic for 20-10, a Cu; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00027.html (8,968 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] SteppIR's on 6m (score: 1): Author: "Bill W5WVO" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:41:10 -0600; Hi Doug, I agree with your evaluation that the 3-el SteppIR with the 6m element is probably the way to go. I don't think you will suffer much degradation when comparing it to your current 5-element (; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00034.html (10,958 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] SteppIR's on 6m (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:02:28 -0600; The only experience I have with STEPP-IRs on 6M is with a friends 2 element version, which gave reasonable results, that is it behaved like I expected a 2 element beam to behave. So I can't give you; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00035.html (8,876 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] SteppIR's on 6m (score: 1): Author: Thomas Hybiske <t_biskit@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 04:22:59 -0700 (PDT); Doug, I run a 3L SteppIR with the passive element on 6m. I had a stack of modest sized yagis, and wished to consolidate. I'm a bit disappointed in the SteppIR's performance on six in that I thought; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00037.html (10,719 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] SteppIR's on 6m (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <doug@k4ac.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:55:37 -0400; I wanted to say thanks to all for a lot of valuable input that has helped me to figure out what I want to do. The comments on and off list were a mixed bag for the performance of the DB-18 and the 3L; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00044.html (8,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]