Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Self\-spotting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Self\-spotting\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Rick R <rick1ds@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:39:09 -0400; I'd like to get some feedback from those who may have used self-spotting.What means did you use? Tweet? Phone? APRS? APP? Internet?Was it useful? Did it change the dynamic of your operation? Any grea; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00081.html (6,854 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: "Joel Harrison" <w5zn@w5zn.org>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:52:03 -0500; Hi Rick & gang, There was a good group on EME during the contest. In the past it has simply been trying to find a needle in a haystack which was quite frustrating. This weekend we were able to post w; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00082.html (8,177 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 09:59:12 -0600 (MDT); heh... I believe I may have a chance to score a wee bit higher up the Big Operator chain this time, because I did not burn operating time by fiddling with a cellphone, futzing with APRS, tweetling or; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00083.html (9,148 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:04:59 +0000 (UTC); I don't think it will turn into a spotting contest. It's too much fun to have it the other way. I did check the map on KST for locations of E clouds. This did help. I did look at the chatter, but it; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00084.html (10,023 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:06:41 -0500; The new spotting rules turned out great. It was far less boring having packet during slow periods. (Although I admit I dozed off about a hundred times on Sunday!) I was afraid the spotting network wo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00085.html (8,649 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Jarred Jackson <jarred.jackson@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:42:29 -0400; I used normal radio based APRS for awhile and APRS-IS from my phone when my HT died. I had no feedback from anyone that they used it to track me. I made one phone call to a friend that generated 3 co; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00087.html (9,277 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:42:59 +0000 (UTC); I tried the cell SMS tweet-to-spot function a few times, but I don't think self-spotting makes much difference for a qrp/portable in a low VHF activity region (EM53). I also tried to find someone on; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00088.html (9,967 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: Bob K0NR - email list <list@k0nr.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:24:08 -0600; I operating a fixed station so my use of assistance was mostly on dxmaps.com, watching for general propagation trends. I spotted a few stations when I thought it would be helpful to expose changing c; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00139.html (9,847 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Self-spotting (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:01:05 -0500; I never understood the ban on using phone calls to set up QSOs. Now that this door has been open, what is the chance that we might see these tools allowed for HF contests? Hopefully at least for the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-06/msg00140.html (11,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]