Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Rover\]\s+Stupid\s+Categories\s+\[was\:Are\s+you\s+ready\s+forthe\s+January\s+SS\?\?\]\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: [Rover] Stupid Categories [was:Are you ready forthe January SS??] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:00:11 -0500
Exactly...but here's the problem with the category: It's basic premise is that it is MULTI-OPERATOR. If you limit anything, it should be the number of operators, not the number of bands. Limited Mul
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00019.html (9,151 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: [Rover] Stupid Categories [was:Are you ready forthe January SS??] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:04:41 -0500
When UPS took 220-222 MHz, they cited ARRL contest summaries as proof of the overall lack of use of the frequencies. When I decide what bands to add to my station, I use ARRL contest summaries to de
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00020.html (8,729 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu