Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+MFJ\s+verions\s+of\s+G0KSC\s+LFA\'s\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: Byron Tatum <bjtatum1@att.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:50:59 +0000 (UTC)
Hello-   Has anyone used any of the MFJ versions of the 144 or 222 Mhz G0KSC loop fed yagis and would be in a position to provide evaluations of them? I have studied the Innov versions a lot and am v
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00064.html (7,158 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Miller, AJ6T" <aj6t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:51:45 -0600
Byron, I have also been intrigued by the LFA Yagi design.  I recently ordered a Cushcraft/MFJ model LFA-2M9EL and I had hoped to get it operational by the January VHF contest.  However, due to constr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00071.html (10,139 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 05:29:17 +0000 (UTC)
I have had a 9 element 2M LFA up for a few years and it has worked great. Mine is home built however and not MFJ. I used plastic electric fence insulators to mount the elements above the boom. TorN4O
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00072.html (10,754 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:28:42 -0600
Well, you got me curious, Walt. I'm not sure what Cushcraft mounting style is, but are they not insulated from the boom? And the original G0KSC design used insulated elements? The lengths of elements
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00073.html (12,102 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Miller, AJ6T" <aj6t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:05:25 -0600
Zack, The Cushcraft mounting style that I referred to makes use of a small aluminum saddle plus a cylindrical "half-washer" (both with through holes) to secure the solid rod elements to the boom usin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00074.html (13,513 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:20:10 -0600
Thanks for the info Walt! I would assume some element length correction factor is needed, so I'd think if G0KSC helped, he took that into consideration. Too bad the MFJ product wasn't of higher quali
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00075.html (16,041 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] MFJ verions of G0KSC LFA's (score: 1)
Author: Bill Olson <callbill@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:17:50 +0000
When MFJ "buys" a company or product line and puts their name on it, is the end result EVER of higher quality?? hah hah.. The old Cushcraft element mounting method goes WAAAY back (remember the old C
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00077.html (23,679 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu