Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+It\s+was\s+asked\s+why\s+do\s+I\s+bother\s+with\s+LOTW\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+It\s+was\s+asked\s+why\s+do\s+I\s+bother\s+with\s+LOTW\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] It was asked why do I bother with LOTW... (score: 1): Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 02:31:38 +0000; Hi Folks, I was asked why do I bother with using LOTW on VHF when its clear LOTW was never meant to confirm VHF+ QSOS as it was originally developed only for HF DXers and Contesters. It works Kinda q; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00107.html (7,933 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] It was asked why do I bother with LOTW... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:55:57 -0500; The original TQSL software sucked. It was all re-written a few years ago, primarily by K1MU, and now (with occasional bumps) just works. The original online directions also sucked but they've been re; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-06/msg00108.html (8,590 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]