Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Is\s+FT8\s+Really\s+the\s+Problem\s+with\s+VHF\s+Contests\?\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: <k3sk@buckwalter.co>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:32:12 -0400
I blame most of the weekend on very bad propagation and mostly general lack of participation. This was both, the worst propagation in 30 years I ever remember during a VHF contest. And, it was also m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00047.html (8,572 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Paul N1BUG FN55mf <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 08:54:37 -0400
Decreasing activity has hurt some of us greatly. It is painfully obvious that there are not as many stations active as their used to be. Or at the very least, fewer well equipped / high power station
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00048.html (9,900 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Fred Stefanik <n1dpmfred@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 22:12:13 -0400
I think there's a few factors.... 1. FT8 operations as the "norm" have driven a number of people away from VHF contesting. I for one am one of those people.... Now with the analog only category it se
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00054.html (11,820 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Bates <kv4zy.1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 03:33:24 -0400
VHFrs, IMHO FT8 has become the dog to kick as an excuse for contest capable hams to decline to participate in contests. They have become disgruntled that they no longer get pileups where they can wor
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00055.html (14,218 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 11:55:39 -0400
I think another way to put it, is that correlation does not imply causation. Anyway, I thought I'd chime in with a new ham perspective. I got my license two years ago which means that I got to build
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00056.html (10,181 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Olson <callbill@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:06:14 +0000
Fred you are SO YOUNG!!!!!! bill ________________________________ From: VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting-bounces+callbill=hotmail.com@contesting.com> on behalf of Fred Stefanik <n1dpmfred@gmail.com> Sent
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00057.html (14,647 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 14:18:54 -0400
Jeff, it is true that it is costly but in general it has gotten less expensive. I was licensed in 1981+/- when I was in Jr. High and most if not all of the new HF rigs didn't even cover 6m. There wer
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00059.html (13,383 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 13:25:04 -0500
When you REALLY get hooked on it, you want more and more bands. I started out by building a 2m transverter in 1990. Then added 50 MHz. Then added 432. Then added 222. All homebrew transverters and an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00060.html (13,151 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <markspencer@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:31:04 +0000
In my view approx 20 to 25 years or so ago there seemed to be more options for out of the box VHF / UHF gear. I recall both Icom and Yeasu had affordably priced HF/VHF/UHF gear, plus more VHF oriente
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00061.html (18,914 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <markspencer@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:36:25 +0000
Also re brick amps. Maybe I have been lucky with mine. I can accept there may be issues at times with some of them (and this may also be true for other products as well.) In my view sharing experienc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00062.html (20,543 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: David Olean <k1whs@metrocast.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 15:51:43 -0400
Hello Zack, It was heartening to read your response to the activity conundrum. You were the only one who mentioned building anything!! I got started in ham radio as a school kid with no money. In fac
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00063.html (17,205 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <markspencer@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:22:34 +0000
One more thought.. In my experience there does seem to be a general lack of patience on the part of some newcomers to VHF and up weak signal operating and contesting. Some HF operators have commented
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00064.html (10,656 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:20:57 -0400
The Q5 transverter looks really nice, but it doesn't help with the "new ham, unsure which part of the hobby will be fun long-term" aspect of it. That's what I was trying to get at. The 9700 also seem
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00065.html (10,377 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 17:45:37 -0400
I get the itch and I don't consider myself "REALLY hooked" :) ... Earlier this year, I started tinkering with circuits with the intention of making *something* radio related. Maybe the something shou
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00066.html (10,138 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 16:54:42 -0500
W1GHZ has some excellent designs for transverters from 902 MHz to 10 GHz. The articles are all on his website. And the pc boards he supplies for them are all very inexpensive! The parts are also easy
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00067.html (10,799 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Fred Stefanik <n1dpmfred@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:19:11 -0400
So for a new ham pick up a good used FT847 or similar for about $600 and you'll have 100w on 160 through 6 and 50w on 144 and 432....all modes repeater offsets etc etc.... 73 Fred N1DPM _____________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00068.html (11,276 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: "Terry Price" <terry@directivesystems.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:07:49 -0400
Well I think FT8 is a problem when it comes to passing and the "fix" that was installed earlier this year is not a good answer. FT8 does make working weaker stations easier especially if the other op
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00071.html (21,939 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 22:35:01 -0400
I was the main two meter op at W2SZ. I am not opposed to FT8 it is an advantage to those with no other advantage. That said, it is huge time suck, where SSB and CW QSOs can take as little as 10 secon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00072.html (12,566 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:52:23 -0400
It's been a while since I looked at W1GHZ's designs, so I should look again. Thanks & 73, Jeff (AC1JR) _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00082.html (10,222 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] Is FT8 Really the Problem with VHF Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jeffpc@josefsipek.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:01:22 -0400
Not a bad choice. One of the questions I had when I was shopping for my first radio was about how often are new radios released. Even high-end electronics tend to get obsoleted on yearly basis, so it
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-09/msg00083.html (10,935 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu