Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Ideal\s+contesting\s+rig\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: johngeig@yahoo.com (John Geiger)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
SO what is the opinion of list members as to the best VHF/UHF radio for contesting? I have used several, with varying results. If it were up to me, here is what the ideal rig would look like. Lets ca
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01954.html (8,826 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
If it were up to me, here is what the ideal rig would look like. Lets call it the Yaesu FT746 (an upgrade from the 736, as the 847 was a step backwards) OK ... and AlGore can dream of an internal com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01960.html (8,612 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: kb1grs@joelweber.org (Joel N. Weber II)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
It's not clear that a rig with all the features you describe would end up being the most cost-effective solution for a multiop station, since multiop stations frequently want a single radio for each
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01961.html (8,772 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
I agree with some of the other comments that a single radio is not the right way to go. As many of you may be aware, the idea of using more than one radio for HF contesting is becoming mandatory to b
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01962.html (11,091 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (David Olean)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
Hi guys, I would echo Bob's (N5NJ) statement. In all these ideal rig postings, I see no mention of dynamic range and phase noise considerations. I guess if you live in the booonies and use a small lo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01963.html (14,148 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: w2fca@cs.com (w2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
Amen. Bells and whistles may be nice, but during one contest I had W2SZ/1 60 miles to my east with a kw on 6 & 2, and KB2ZVP 9 miles to my north also with a kw on 6 & 2. My major need was a crunch-pr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01965.html (8,492 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: callbill@hotmail.com (Bill Olson)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
Hi Guys, The obvious place where the all band "rice box" may be OK IS in the ROVER situation where some compromises have to be made to fit the rig into the front seat of '83 Yugo "rovermobile"!! True
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01967.html (8,578 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:34 2003
I mostly agree, top end RF performance is a must, the all current do everything boxes are filled to brim with bells and whistles, most of which still don't help you SEE what's happening on the bands
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01968.html (10,047 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: hwardsil@centurytel.net (Ward Silver)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
Not being a big-time VHF/UHF contester, please discount my opinion appropriately, but I'm a systems guy and we can't pass up this sort of discussion :-) Here's an entirely different architecture for
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01972.html (11,105 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
Bingo! - Now where can I start buying this stuff?? Now before the naysayers start talking about poor RF performance because this concept would use <gasp> - computers, I want to stress this technology
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01973.html (13,792 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: radioman@rfcpa.ath.cx (Radioman)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
We should just worry about other problems that will creep up.. in these "all in one box" radios that they can't fix in the duel banders they have now.. like 1: Bad SWR curcits that lower power for no
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01975.html (16,650 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Ideal contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: W2fca@cs.com (W2fca@cs.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
I can see QSK on HF where you have 200 people trying to get CY0MM at 30 wpm, but most VHF cw tends to a lot slower. I would be interested in seeing what kind of technology on could use at 432 for tha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01976.html (7,917 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu