Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Elecraft\s+XV144\s+QST\s+Review\s+Online\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:54:42 -0500
ARRL Members can now download the October, 2004 QST Product Review column online in PDF format. The first product reviewed is the Elecraft XV144 transverter kit - a 20W 144 MHz transverter for a 28 M
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00003.html (8,785 bytes)

2. RE: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: "John Wilcox / NS1Z" <ns1z@gwi.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 22:54:34 -0000
I like to build and am looking at making 90? my next kit. Question is, there are two versions: one for 902 and one for 903. I am not too interested in building one that I can't use. Why the two versi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00004.html (7,381 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: Duane Grotophorst <n9dg@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
-- "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com> wrote: I really wish that the ARRL would do another review of the current generation 50-28CK along with its higher band siblings. The current 50-28CK
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00006.html (8,959 bytes)

4. RE: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 22:28:56 -0500 (CDT)
Different areas of the country seem to use different frequencies as the calling frequency. In this area (Illinois - Midwest) we use 903.100. Other areas of the country use 902.100. Best find out what
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00007.html (8,163 bytes)

5. RE: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:37:04 -0400
Why not buy the 902 model, and if you need to work someone on 903, just shift the IF radio up a megahertz? I would'nt think that there would be any bandwidth issues with either a 28 or 144 MHz IF. Da
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00022.html (9,263 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: <samir.popaja@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:44:25 +0100 (MET)
Hello, Taken from, the http://www.df9ic.de/tech/trxtest/trxtest.html "The Elecraft K2 also has a low IF design using conventional VCOs which should result in a good LO noise supression but does not.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00020.html (10,316 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Zimmerman" <ezimmerm@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:50:07 -0500
Hello Samir I was the one who did the review of the XV144 in QST. But I am NOT responsible for the technical data which was generated by the ARRL lab. I used the XV144 with an FT1000MP as an IF strip
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00021.html (14,590 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu