Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+AU\s+\-\s+How\s+near\s+for\s+VHF\s+prop\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+AU\s+\-\s+How\s+near\s+for\s+VHF\s+prop\s+\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] AU - How near for VHF prop ? (score: 1): Author: Charles.Morrison@apcc.com; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:44:51 -0400; Aurora range question: The noaa.gov site states " ( Keep in mind that aurora can still be viewed when it's position is 4 to 5 degrees of latitude away from the viewer, although it will appear [at ] a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00100.html (7,079 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] AU - How near for VHF prop ? (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:15:36 -0400; Hi Charles, That is an interesting question which I can not answer. I hope someone else can. However, I can tell you that a significant amount of aurora is completely "missed" in North America. I was; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00101.html (8,895 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] AU - How near for VHF prop ? (score: 1): Author: WBR WF4R <wbr@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:16:10 -0400; Charles.Morrison@apcc.com wrote: Aurora range question: The noaa.gov site states " ( Keep in mind that aurora can still be viewed when it's position is 4 to 5 degrees of latitude away from the viewer; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00103.html (8,665 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] AU - How near for VHF prop ? (score: 1): Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:02:39 -0400; N1BUG wrote: However, I can tell you that a significant amount of aurora is completely "missed" in North America. I was not listening last night, but over the past few months there have been several; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-10/msg00105.html (8,644 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]