Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Trends\s+in\s+VHF\/UHF\s+Weak\s+Signal\s+Operations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Trends\s+in\s+VHF\/UHF\s+Weak\s+Signal\s+Operations\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operations (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 21:43:00 -0700; Les and everyone - Good points all. But when it comes down to it, the answer lies in ourselves - Get on the air. Get on often. Call CQ when you dont hear anyone. Turn the beam and call CQ again. Enco; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00030.html (13,185 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operations (score: 1): Author: "Roger Thawley" <Roger@G0BSU.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:04:24 -0500; As an amateur based in the UK, I find this topic of discussion all too familiar as we also struggle with low levels of activity on VHF and up. already done in the US, to increase VHF+ activity, so my; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00041.html (10,514 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operations (score: 1): Author: "Roger Thawley" <Roger@G0BSU.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:11:04 -0500; As an amateur based in the UK, I find this topic of discussion all too familiar as we also struggle with low levels of activity on VHF and up. already done in the US, to increase VHF+ activity, so my; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00043.html (11,081 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]