Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+How\s+dead\s+are\s+the\s+bands\,\s+for\s+you\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+How\s+dead\s+are\s+the\s+bands\,\s+for\s+you\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] How dead are the bands, for you? (score: 1): Author: "Lloyd Berg" <lloydberg@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 23:07:23 -0500; Hi Steve! Hummm - I wonder if there might be a technical problem. ( water in coax connectors, water in driven elements, etc. ) I'm running SOLP, and I've got 73 QSOs so far, including Ohio, Indiana,; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-08/msg00021.html (9,383 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] How dead are the bands, for you? (score: 1): Author: "Todd Sprinkmann" <sprinkies@excel.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 06:54:04 -0500; I saw where MI had scattered t-storms for much of the afternoon. Sure that was a factor. Still worked fair amount of MI activity, under average condx. MI stations I worked y'day -- K2YAZ, N8PVT, NE8I; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-08/msg00023.html (9,351 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] How dead are the bands, for you? (score: 1): Author: STeve Andre' <andres@msu.edu>; Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 10:53:01 -0400; I've gotten some great, even hysterical comments on this, but most were to me directly. So some people are doing OK, a one person said his best DX was 10 miles, one contact. ;-) I now have a munifice; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-08/msg00025.html (8,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]