Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+$no\s+subject$\s*$/: 75 ]

Total 75 documents matching your query.

41. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Ken Kent" <KA2LIM@stny.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:35:26 -0500; Multi-Limited station KA2LIM will be operating on the Jan VHF contest from near Pine Valley, NY in grid FN12nf on bands 50 Mhz thru 432 Mhz. Rovers, we would welcome your rover plans and will look fo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00007.html (6,848 bytes)
42. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: K3EGE@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:23:49 EDT; The Packrats station W3CCX operating from Camelback Mountain near Tannersville, PA in grid FN21hb is actively looking for WSJT contacts on both 6 and 2 meters for Sunday between 0400Z and 1100Z for t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00002.html (7,508 bytes)
43. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: jamesduffey@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:12:04 +0000; If you want a simple antenna for 6M, a dipole will work fine. You can make a 2 element wire Yagi without too much more work. Or a wire Moxon. Google for dimensions. If you have time for a trip to Hom; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00138.html (7,423 bytes)
44. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:28:21 -0800; What the grid circling is acomplishing is less activity. There are as many rovers as was before, but the increased activity has been in the circlers as those who tried to work everyone and still comp; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00037.html (8,994 bytes)
45. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Christopher S Peightal" <peightalhead@msn.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:29:15 -0600; I am looking for feedback on what type of computer interface seems to be the best for getting on the digital modes. I was looking at the rigblaster pro by west mountain. 73, chris, ka3zls. __________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00072.html (6,967 bytes)
46. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 07:58:27 -0500; Depends on whether you want to spend money or not ;) A couple of 600 ohm isolation transformers from Radio Shaft and some soldering of cables will get you on the air for a small percentage of the cos; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00075.html (7,875 bytes)
47. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:59:29 -0700; So if I have this correct a limited rover can still pack 10 bands and grid circle with rovers as a team with stations that fit in a lunchbox to over inflate their scores with QSOs made across a farme; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00237.html (8,429 bytes)
48. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:47:05 -0700; Hold on Jim, I confused you. There is no one handing out bogus QSOs as a strategy. Im glad to see you are a bit upset at the thought of such an idea. That being said there are no good tools to stop i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00447.html (9,199 bytes)
49. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>; Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:09:35 -0700; Frank, What are the names of the people that refused to share their logs and when were they asked? Jim, AF6O _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@c; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00450.html (7,868 bytes)
50. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:11:05 -0500; I have been working on putting together microwave equipment for my station for 7 or 8 years now. Each of my working transverters has cost me maybe $150 per band. It's not so much the cost as the time; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00453.html (9,053 bytes)
51. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: N6FD <n6fd@mchsi.com>; Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:17:24 -0700; Zack, Have you thought about publishing your designs and design philosophy? I for one would be very interested in seeing how you did it. I have been trying to design something similar, but have not y; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00475.html (8,580 bytes)
52. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:29:49 -0500; Hi Erich, Most of the circuits I'm using are other people's designs. Maybe the way I put them together is unique. Once I did talk with Kermit W9XA about doing a presentation at Central States this ye; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00485.html (10,011 bytes)
53. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Bruce Herrick <bdh@teleport.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:37:01 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Hi Les It would seem to me that, like others have said, if the HT was used by only one other operator, this would be fine. The rules are quite clear that a radio can only be used by one operator. I t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00243.html (9,303 bytes)
54. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: kevin kaufhold <kkaufhold@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:08:29 -0700 (PDT); Thanks Tad for the comment on they QST article. As to the strong uptick in June, I think it is related to both the HF + 6 rigs and the club competition since 2003. I wrote a prior article comparing; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00124.html (8,182 bytes)
55. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: "Bill W5WVO" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:53:04 -0600; Here's another reason I think the CQ VHF in July has soared in popularity: It allows stations without weak-signal UHF/microwave capabilities -- most of us, after all -- to enter and be competitive! Y; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00145.html (9,421 bytes)
56. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: n2lid@aol.com; Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:04:07 -0500; http://sites.google.com/site/emfxnkteuv/mtkjtnf4ck _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00048.html (6,886 bytes)
57. Re: [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 11:11:48 -0600; Is this REALLY David Colvin posting this? And what is it - a virus? 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00051.html (7,633 bytes)
58. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: n2lid@aol.com; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:09:52 -0500; http://lordbuddha-edu.org/RFEMDNxYXe.htm _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-02/msg00014.html (6,779 bytes)
59. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Rick R <rick1ds@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:23:20 -0400; Armed with the newly acquired 432 long beam, I was active for the first 2.5 hrs of the 432 sprint with 26 QSOs from FN43 north to FM07 south. Great reports running 100watts. I was out in the van on a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-04/msg00092.html (7,296 bytes)
60. [VHFcontesting] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: frank bechdoldt <k3uhf@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:37:51 -0800; test _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-02/msg00033.html (6,782 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]