Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wbr@verizon.net: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 2 Port Pwr Div (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r)
Date: Mon Jul 14 14:08:19 2003
M2 sells one. Don't know the cost, but you can contact them via e-mail or visit their web site. I bought one from them and am quite satified with it. It works excellent. 73, Bill, WF4R
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00070.html (6,947 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Stacking Distance? (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r)
Date: Tue Jul 15 10:48:12 2003
Hello Tom, I believe a good figure for spacing long yagis is half the boom length. I have a pair of 18XXX and M2 says the optimum spacing is 14.5 feet, which is pretty close to half the boom length.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00074.html (7,821 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] One signal per band [was: REMINDER: ... CU2QSOPioneers] (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r)
Date: Mon Jul 21 13:15:12 2003
I've been reading with intrest this discussion on CU2QSO and am wondering what antenna polarity is favored for this? I could assume that since it's FM it would be verticle, but since most weak signal
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00121.html (11,949 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r)
Date: Mon Jul 21 14:52:48 2003
I've sort of enjoyed reading it. I think that I've learned something. But I do believe now that all that's necessary has been said (I think) HI. Please ignor my previous post. I've since gone to the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00123.html (10,490 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Yagi Stacking... Newbie Question (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr wf4r)
Date: Mon Jul 28 19:11:47 2003
The phasing co-ax only needs to be of equal lengths to each antenna from the power divider. The actual length(s) should only be as long as necessary to reduce losses. Just be sure they're the same le
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00223.html (9,708 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] 2m Sprint (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (ARS WF4R)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:03 2003
Hello to all. I'm new to this reflector, but not new to vhf contests. Although condx were not great, I managed to work 21 contacts and 14 different grids. I only learned of the 2m sprint a couple of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00292.html (6,928 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] FM Simplex freqs? (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (William B. Runyon, Sr.)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:04 2003
According to the ARRL Band Plan for 2 meters anywhere between 146.40 to 146.58 are simplex freqs 146.52 is off limits for contesting however. Also between 147.42 to 147.57 are simplex freqs with no r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00326.html (7,955 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] upcoming Perseids and WSJT/FSK441 (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wf4r)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:17 2003
Hello All, Has there been much thought given to the protocol during the upcoming Perseids? In particular, I'm wondering if 15 sec intervals even & odd quarter minutes would be more appropriate, as we
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00343.html (7,065 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Alternate PING JOCKEY ? (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wf4r)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:18 2003
Is there an alternate we may be able to use for ping jockey? tnx, 73, Bill WF4R FM16ts
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00348.html (6,285 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] Tnx Chris N0UK (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wf4r)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:18 2003
Many tnx to you for PJC. Really missed it when it was down. 73, Bill WF4R
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00351.html (6,227 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] AA1YN & WSJT Database (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wf4r)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:18 2003
I'm wondering if AA1YN is still maintaining the "LOOKUP" database for WSJT? There seems to be some corrupted data but don't know his e-mail address to correspond w/ him. Can anyone help on this matte
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00355.html (6,459 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] belay my last hve found e-mail address for AA1YN (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wf4r)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:18 2003
73, Bill
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00356.html (6,383 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] 220 FM (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:16 2003
Nothing like a good controversy to stir up some activity. Maybe I'll try some contacts on 220 FM. I've just recently acquired a 220 FM rig. A point & multiplier is just that. Thanks for the encourage
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00671.html (6,328 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] qsl address for W4SIX ? (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:16 2003
Hello all, Anyone know if W4SIX (EM97) is still around es if so a good address for QSL? QRZ address = n.g. Tnx, 73, Bill
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00685.html (6,421 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] SPAM ON THIS REFLECTOR (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:16 2003
I sincerely hope that this reflector does not continue sending me "spam" It appears that someone named "Alex Smith" <alex@lazaro.xohost.com> has figured out how to send spam to this reflector.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00701.html (6,550 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] Re: [WSWSS] QST contest results (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:17 2003
Unfortunately it's NOT a ".pdf" file and it appears that it can only be viewed using I.E. (not Netscape) I see a blank white page. I don't understand how you can say it's a .pdf I'm assuming you're r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00706.html (16,402 bytes)

17. [VHFcontesting] [Fwd: fiberglass pipe] (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:17 2003
Don, Here is a reply to my query about fiberglass pipe. I thought that I would post this so all may benefit from the knowledge. Considering that it is probably much more expensive than aluminum I wou
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00717.html (6,653 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] response text (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:17 2003
OOPS. for some reason the msg did not follow for the post Here is what the reply to my query: fiberglass would be some 30% lighter weight, stronger but about 4 times more flexible than Aluminum. And
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00718.html (7,619 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] op note (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:08 2003
Hello All, Just would like to throw my hat into the ring and let you know that I will be radio active for the June ARRL VHF Sweepstakes from FM16ts. Don't forget to turn your antennas toward FM16. ap
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00731.html (6,770 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] WSJT - FSK441 (score: 1)
Author: wbr@verizon.net (wbr@verizon.net)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:12 2003
Hello Randy, I've not seen anyone else reply so I will. The general calling freq of 144.140 has been agreed upon by I believe most everyone interested in this mode. A good place to make skeds and rea
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00815.html (7,699 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu