Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9rm@calmesapartners.com: 202 ]

Total 202 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [VHFcontesting] An idea for the sprints. (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:46:00 -0600
Dave, you need to look at the BIG picture here. Be happy you live in or near the "Sprint corridor" and actually have access to enough activity to make it through the first hour. Lamenting about not r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-10/msg00013.html (12,928 bytes)

182. [VHFcontesting] Looking for 2M M/S sked from Alabama (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 10:23:09 -0700
Anybody in western AL want to run a meteor scatter sked on 2M during the upcoming Quadrantids shower ? Probably be best if you have some power since we're taking about >1200 miles. -W9RM DM58 CO Keit
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-12/msg00008.html (6,880 bytes)

183. Re: [VHFcontesting] Tech Help needed (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 09:39:40 -0700
When the FT8 bug infected everyone a few years back, I retuned 2 original 6M7's high enough to be 1.5:1 at 50.313 by moving the t-match shorting bars as far outboard as they would go. Yes, the origin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00006.html (14,777 bytes)

184. [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF test "3 BAND" category (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:02:39 -0700
I think it's humorous that a lot of folks still think there is a HIGH POWER category as a subset of the 3 BAND class. But, it brings up a question. I, personally, would be all over a category like 3
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00043.html (8,336 bytes)

185. Re: [VHFcontesting] SO2R 6m/2m 6m causing S9 noise on 2m (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:24:01 -0700
I have the opposite problem. When I TX on 2, it overloads and quiets the 6M radio. I have a 2M stub filter on the 6M receive line for other purposes, which probably gives me 10-15 dB of extra rejecti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00050.html (10,804 bytes)

186. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Test 3 Band Category - long rant better delete!! (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:26:05 -0700
Re: Distance based scoring - how's this going to work when guys are routinely using EME to pad their mults on 2 and 432 ?? Are we talking about sending EME Qs in VHF contests back to where they belon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00069.html (19,072 bytes)

187. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF test "3BAND" category (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 07:38:15 -0700
After further thought, I'm withdrawing my proposal for a separate high power sub-category -W9RM Keith J Morehouse Managing Partner Calmesa Partners G.P. Olathe, CO ___________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00088.html (6,780 bytes)

188. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:55:01 -0700
Since that's the case Chet, I assume I'll hear you running 'em on SSB in June, the 1st time signals on the FT8 channel get loud ? In my opinion, if it's a contest, 6M signals are loud and one is CQin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00134.html (8,208 bytes)

189. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:29:57 -0700
I'm glad we're on the same page. That's what I wanted to hear ! Now, you and I are united and hopefully we'll be able to pull more activity back to SSB during CONTESTS where, during CONTESTS, rate is
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00136.html (10,416 bytes)

190. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:14:41 -0700
Alex, it's my opinion one of the reasons we even have to deal with this issue is that the 'movers and shakers' of the contest world are HFcentric. Except for one contest (10M test) almost every other
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00138.html (11,153 bytes)

191. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8, digital, and VHF contesting.... (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 08:12:21 -0700
Zack, I haven't yet found a WSJT mode that could handle AU well (actually, at all..). Possibly the NEW (...another one ??) Q65 mode could work on 6M since it's supposed to be relatively immune to dop
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00160.html (14,895 bytes)

192. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 217, Issue 56 (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:42:40 -0700
We don't dislike FT8, Jim. We like it when it's used properly in contesting. When signals are loud and the FT8 'channel' is overloaded with activity and there's not a SINGLE signal below 50.300 and i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00191.html (17,857 bytes)

193. Re: [VHFcontesting] The impact of the digital modes on the January VHF Contest and some suggestions on dealing with those impacts (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 20:43:46 -0700
.. George, you've pretty much read my mind and put my exact thoughts into words. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-02/msg00015.html (13,664 bytes)

194. Re: [VHFcontesting] There is still hope on 6m (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:04:55 -0700
..guess it must be an east coast thing. All summer, both during and outside the June contest, I could see 50.313 wall-to-wall with LOUD (I'm talking over S9) signals with not a single one between 50.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-02/msg00031.html (11,325 bytes)

195. Re: [VHFcontesting] More January digital points (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 09:43:49 -0600
** I also think it healthy to have these discussions about mode selections, but it does no one any good to exaggerate the issues and solutions. In most cases data, or common sense, is available to su
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-03/msg00017.html (10,599 bytes)

196. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 219, Issue 9 (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 11:22:19 -0600
120/hr before or after you take into account all the 'not in log' dings you're going to get hit with ?? -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-03/msg00024.html (11,400 bytes)

197. Re: [VHFcontesting] Conditions and the digital modes (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:57:18 -0600
I've made this point before, but it's worth repeating. If you're not seriously contesting, run whatever mode makes you happy. If you think you are seriously contesting and you stay on FT8 or what-hav
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-03/msg00026.html (12,083 bytes)

198. [VHFcontesting] MSK144 in the contest (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 06:33:56 -0600
PEOPLE - PLEASE stop using RR73 when running meteor scatter. DO NOT assume the other guy will hear your ONE RR73 TX on meteors !!! Use RRR and 73 (optional) PLEASE !!! -W9RM Keith J Morehouse Managin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-06/msg00064.html (6,765 bytes)

199. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL/CAC: VHF Contest Proposal(s) (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:56:43 -0600
So, being a dumb American and knowing nothing about the IARU R1 contests, can I infer they have seperated out MGM (machine genertaed modes) and CW/SSB as seperate contests ? Unfortunately, I think if
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-09/msg00055.html (10,454 bytes)

200. Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Activity Night RADIOS (score: 1)
Author: Jay RM <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:34:26 -0700
I use an old DEMI transverter - there's all sorts of them out there. A new transverter from Q5signal is $500 for the 25W version. -W9RM Keith Morehouse via MotoG _____________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-12/msg00045.html (10,067 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu