Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2ev@yahoo.com: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Test for Subscriber Filter (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:37:34 -0800 (PST)
If this gets through, then the list is open to anyone to post. This email account is not subscribed to the list. Let's see what happens. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00171.html (7,253 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Joel W5ZN ARRL President to speak at banquet!Microwave Update 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
... Bravo Ron and Bravo Joel! Ev, W2EV __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-10/msg00031.html (8,378 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Root Cause: Grid Circling (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:43:04 -0800 (PST)
I am a recovering Grid Circler. :) The root cause of the problem is dual-faceted and is based as follows: 1. How a "New QSO" is defined and 2. The limited number of participants in even the most popu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00044.html (7,479 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Captive Roving...whatever that is, really (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:54:32 -0800 (PST)
Imaginations are powerful things. We can create monstors in our closet or under our beds based on the scratches of a mouse in the ceiling. Until someone can (1) define the term and (2) point to data
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00046.html (6,969 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Roving...whatever that is, really (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Hi Jim, It has been my experience that, without a common understanding, meaningful communication is improbable. If something cannot be defined, then its very existance should be treated a suspect at
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00048.html (7,957 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive Roving...whatever that is, really (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:23:38 -0800 (PST)
During years when 6m doesn't open out here in the wide-open land of Colorado, ALL of our so-called "unique callsign scores" which Ev recommends, will suck. We'll work the same 10-20 guys all weekend,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00052.html (10,026 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover behavior: How about trying to address"it" withOUT having to define "it"? (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 15:43:14 -0800 (PST)
Summary...I think the area to address is the "Scoring" methodology...and NOT with Quotas or limits or having to be worried about "defining" the behavior. If the incentive is not there in the scoring
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00053.html (7,668 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Changing "it" - The framework for a new contest (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 16:01:31 -0800 (PST)
Playing off of John's suggestion... SO...might the area to address be the SCORING system? This IS a contest and SCORING IS a part of it. Probably ANY scoring system will have a way to be "optimized"
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00055.html (8,275 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] HamIM/APRS and Non-ham observers [was: CaptiveRoving...] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 19:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Hi Nate, Different sponsors have different rules. The way that I read their rules, it appears that the ETDXA and SVHFS Sprints and CQ VHF allow for Internet, relaying and digipeating (hence, full APR
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00062.html (8,984 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Changing "it" - The framework for a new contest (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Hi Dean, The point of this proposal is "changing it". The "it" is the grid-based centricity of the presently dominant (in North America) scoring system. Interestingly, the proposed change does exactl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00068.html (8,454 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] [Roving...] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 05:30:15 -0800 (PST)
So, I asked him what the difference was between K7CW/VE7 and VE7RCW. They're both legal calls in Canada. I get clipped if I use one of them and passed if I use the other. -- Hi Paul, Though I'm neith
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00072.html (7,085 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] [Roving...] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:47:25 -0800 (PST)
I have asked various people at ARRL why it exists, and have never received an answer. -- Jim, Interestingly, a couple of years ago, we were polled by the ARRL for our opinions on several vhf contest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00078.html (7,940 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Compare: IARU Region 1 6-meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 16:34:58 -0800 (PST)
As we think in terms of a new breed of contest, lets examine how things are done "over there". Here are excerpts from the IARU Region 1 VHF Guidebook as regard their "IARU Region 1 50-MHz Contest". I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00084.html (8,281 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Changing "it" - The framework for a new contest (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:47:23 -0800 (PST)
If someone wants to do a distance scored contest, they could do it with 4 digit grids and run it parallel to the ARRL tests. Anyone who chose to could send a second Cabrillo log to the distance scori
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00086.html (7,939 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] HamIM/APRS and Non-ham observers [was: CaptiveRoving...] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 04:55:33 -0800 (PST)
I interpreted the rules restricting no more than one transmitter active per band to mean that if the APRS is on VHF, the VHF SSB must be off, or vice-versa. Wouldn't you agree? -- Ah yes! You're righ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00092.html (8,956 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] A return to root-cause stuff [was: Some Real RoverData] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:29:52 -0800 (PST)
* The following are generalizations. You'll want to treat them with the appropriate logic filter* As a culture, we tend to believe that the only way that others succeed is because they were somehow (
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00093.html (7,644 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] HamIM/APRS and Non-ham observers [was: CaptiveRoving...] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 15:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Hi Nate, HamIM is is a technology/strategy that works only when others use it too. It will start out slowly in a given area. Don't let it discourage you. Others will join-in over time. Once others us
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00095.html (8,599 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Compare: IARU Region 1 6-meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 20:30:41 -0800 (PST)
-- Original Message -- From: Dan_K9ZF <n9rla@yahoo.com> How about a an option to log the center of the 4 digit grid in case the 6 digit grid is not known? So if I work a station in EM78 that doesn't
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00098.html (8,088 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] Compare: IARU Region 1 6-meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:13:11 -0800 (PST)
The typical (for example German) multipliers are: 1 point for -144, 2 points for 432, 3 for 1296 and 4 for 2304 and up They set the standard for the rest of us. -- The interesting thing at play here
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00099.html (8,281 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] HD Chimney Bracket (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:59:13 -0800 (PST)
I have a modern (13-year old) masonary chimney that has been asking to be dressed up a little. Does anyone have a recommendation as to the "Heaviest Duty" antenna chimney mount that is available for
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00000.html (6,857 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu