- 41. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Contest Rules Change (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:33:26 -0800
- OK, I'll bite. What is "passive assistance"? Is that just the assisted class in HF contesting that allows you to monitor a cluster but no self spotting? 73, Tom K6EU _________________________________
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-02/msg00016.html (10,932 bytes)
- 42. Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Mhz question (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:23:23 -0800
- Hi Dave Can't speak for your part of the country but out West there is about as many (or more) stations on FM than on SSB. My rough survey says about a third FM, a third SSB and about a third have bo
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-12/msg00008.html (9,635 bytes)
- 43. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Contest Question (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:20:43 -0700
- Yes, you can. However, you will likely have to explain to some people that they can work you again if they previously worked you as a rover from you home grid. 73, Tom K6EU & K6EU/r _________________
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-06/msg00011.html (7,939 bytes)
- 44. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Contest Question (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:42:21 -0700
- Sorry, didn't notice the CQ contest instead of ARRL. I believe JK is correct, at least I've not found a provision in the CQ rules that would allow such entries. 73, Tom K6EU _________________________
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-06/msg00024.html (9,087 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu