Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tomc@carneysugai.com: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Contest Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:33:26 -0800
OK, I'll bite. What is "passive assistance"? Is that just the assisted class in HF contesting that allows you to monitor a cluster but no self spotting? 73, Tom K6EU _________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-02/msg00016.html (10,932 bytes)

42. Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Mhz question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:23:23 -0800
Hi Dave Can't speak for your part of the country but out West there is about as many (or more) stations on FM than on SSB. My rough survey says about a third FM, a third SSB and about a third have bo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-12/msg00008.html (9,635 bytes)

43. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Contest Question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 09:20:43 -0700
Yes, you can. However, you will likely have to explain to some people that they can work you again if they previously worked you as a rover from you home grid. 73, Tom K6EU & K6EU/r _________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-06/msg00011.html (7,939 bytes)

44. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ-VHF Contest Question (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:42:21 -0700
Sorry, didn't notice the CQ contest instead of ARRL. I believe JK is correct, at least I've not found a provision in the CQ rules that would allow such entries. 73, Tom K6EU _________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-06/msg00024.html (9,087 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu