Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ne0p@lcisp.com: 53 ]

Total 53 documents matching your query.

41. [VHFcontesting] Cushcraft dualband yagi comments wanted (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:24:31 -0600
Does anyone on the list have experience using the Cushcraft A27010-S dualband yagi? This is the 5 elements on each band version. I currently have the Cushcraft 10 element 2 meter yagi up, but nothing
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-03/msg00036.html (7,240 bytes)

42. [VHFcontesting] 2 meter contest participation (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 04:39:22 -0000
I received the April CQ magazine in the mail today, and in the write up for the 2005 CQVHF contest, the writer made the following statement: "....underscoring the continued decline in 2-meter North A
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00029.html (7,217 bytes)

43. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2 meter contest participation (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:24:15 -0000
Hi Frank, Thanks for the insights. I think that Down East Microwave does donate a couple of gift certificates to be raffled off to anyone sending in a log for the 222mhz sprint and the 902 and up spr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00031.html (12,023 bytes)

44. [VHFcontesting] My 2 meter contesting ideas/opinions (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:22:25 -0500
Based on the quote I referenced yesterday from CQ magazine, here are some ideas I can think of for why 2 meter contesting activity is declining, if in fact it is. I know that CQ and QST probably base
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00035.html (11,760 bytes)

45. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Sprints (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 04:14:27 -0000
I am in agreement here. Although I like the occassional weekday contest-like the 10-10 day sprint and the Canada day contest, but having the sprints on saturday gives more people an opportunity to pl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00063.html (7,518 bytes)

46. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:26:20 -0000
And why does the UHF contest involve a VHF band (222mhz), as well as frequencies above UHF (3.4g and up)? 73s John NE0P Frequencies? ie. anything above 300Mhz is not a VHF frequency. on target would
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00114.html (8,389 bytes)

47. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:27:17 -0000
And maybe we can get the ARRL to add 15 meters to the 10 meter contest. 73s John NE0P _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00115.html (9,019 bytes)

48. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contest Changes??? (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 04:25:28 -0000
And you we also realize that for the 2.3g band one segment is 2300 to 2310mhz. The other segment is 2390 to 2450mhz. Those segments are 80mhz apart, but considered 1 band. That gap is larger than the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00118.html (9,718 bytes)

49. [VHFcontesting] 2m yagi on 432 (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:55:29 -0500
I have a Cushcraft 10 element 2m Yagi (a148-10S) which I have tried to use on 70cm. It shows a good SWR-1.5:1 or so, and hears a little, as I did hear the beacon from Oscar 29 on it this morning. Doe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00147.html (7,017 bytes)

50. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2m yagi on 432 (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:25:55 -0500
Although I did use a 3 element 6 meter beam on 2 meters during an Aurora in 2001. Worked from EN41 to EM58. 73s John NE0P ________________________________________________________________ ____________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00163.html (9,756 bytes)

51. [VHFcontesting] Best contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:13:48 -0500
Which radio is considered to be the best VHF/UHF contesting radio that covers several bands (at least 2m/70cm/23cm) in one box? I know that transverters with a good IF rig are probably the best way t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00200.html (7,355 bytes)

52. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Best contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:47:15 -0000
And I don't know how you can put "contesting" and "706" in the same sentence. The 706MKIIG has one of the worst front ends of any radio I have seen. 73s John NE0P -- Original Message -- From: "Mike (
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00207.html (8,751 bytes)

53. Re: [VHFcontesting] e: [VHF] Best contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:57:07 -0500
Now I will agree that the 706MKIIG, as well as the other micromobiles (FT100D, FT857, FT897) are very good values and great ways to get on VHF/UHF at a very reasonable price. I have used them for exa
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00213.html (12,488 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu