Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nate@natetech.com: 207 ]

Total 207 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [VHFcontesting] Changes to ARRL VHF Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 23:43:29 -0600
Serious question: How does one do this in Cabrillo format? I don't believe there's a way to tag specific bands as "these are the ones we want to use for our score" vs. "these are check logs on these
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00514.html (12,205 bytes)

182. Re: [VHFcontesting] Declaring Bands for Score in ARRL VHF+ Contests (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 00:16:41 -0600
Sorry, I posted my question before I saw this note from Sean. Any software writers monitoring who'll be adding this feature to their logging software to "tag" the bands desired in the very short time
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00515.html (11,111 bytes)

183. Re: [VHFcontesting] Notes and observations (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 23:06:02 -0600
Steve, It sounds like you may have taken some of my comments out of the context of the CURRENT rules. I'm actually arguing REALITY. Not against it. If ARRL wants to add a real multi-op/team Rover cat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00516.html (12,037 bytes)

184. Re: [VHFcontesting] a new Strategy for home and club stations (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:47:51 -0600
Not when roving... the computer can be synced prior to leaving the house, but if it's got an inaccurate clock, unless you have some sort of commercial mobile cellular data service, it won't be able t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00003.html (8,358 bytes)

185. [VHFcontesting] "Maidenhead" iPhone App (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:51:59 -0600
For those roving in the contest... I had an e-mail from another fellow ham a month or two ago saying that his young son's first attempt at programming and releasing "real" software resulted in the pr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00004.html (7,802 bytes)

186. Re: [VHFcontesting] a new Strategy for home and club stations (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:53:04 -0600
You guys must not have tipped enough. :-) -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00005.html (7,957 bytes)

187. [VHFcontesting] W0KVA Multi-Op DM89ci (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:29:55 -0600
The W0KVA Multi-Op Team will be on the air from DM89ci for the ARRL VHF QSO Party! (OF COURSE!) We will be on the air from DM89ci with: 6m - Icom 756 Pro III driving a Henry 2006A amplifier in to a M
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00118.html (8,738 bytes)

188. [VHFcontesting] tons of W0KVA Multi-Op photos (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:02:30 -0600
Two Overstuffed Photo Albums... And growing. -- The "main" album, which has a mix of photos from multiple people and is growing... a lot... <http://www.rmham.org/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=9667> And
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00139.html (10,191 bytes)

189. Re: [VHFcontesting] Brain pickin' time (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:37:11 -0600
A local ham here took a smallish crank up tower, built a frame capable of tipping it over with another electric motor and cable/pulley assembly by balancing it at roughly it's center of gravity when
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00215.html (11,327 bytes)

190. Re: [VHFcontesting] "Handing Out" radio rules/ethics (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:07:31 -0600
You gotta start somewhere!... -- Nate Duehr nate@natetech.com http://facebook.com/denverpilot http://twitter.com/denverpilot _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00259.html (10,092 bytes)

191. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rule 3.3.1.... (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:09:19 -0600
I've always loved the idea of a "Rover Bus" with a bunch of friends. -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com http://facebook.com/denverpilot http://twitter.com/denverpilot _____________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00260.html (11,031 bytes)

192. Re: [VHFcontesting] Handing out things (for thinking about not discussion) (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:55:02 -0600
One is legal and the other isn't. LOL! (Here we go again!) -- Nate Duehr nate@natetech.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00270.html (9,165 bytes)

193. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:34:02 -0600
Just got around to replying to February e-mail in August, George? :-) Been there. No problem. I can't confirm/refute your claim that you've "won" nor in what category or categories, since apparently
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00124.html (9,847 bytes)

194. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:32:37 -0600
Fair 'nuff. -- Nate Duehr nate@natetech.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00126.html (9,878 bytes)

195. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:54:29 -0600
A sure sign that good 10 MHz reference oscillators of all sorts (GPS disciplined, WWV disciplined, etc...) are getting cheap(er) and plentiful? :-) -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com _____________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00136.html (9,453 bytes)

196. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:42:51 -0600
Correct. Always found it curious that there's no readily-available historical record of the category winners, or any "depth charts" beyond that. Even with rules-changes over the decades changing the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00144.html (9,934 bytes)

197. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] New Icom IC-9100 HF/6M/2M/432/1.2GHZ All modes, including D-Star! (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:41:25 -0600
They'll probably put their usual (crippled/proprietary/closed) CI-V crud on that port, instead of a useful truly open protocol that can tell the rig to do anything you want it to... that's published
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00154.html (8,300 bytes)

198. Re: [VHFcontesting] GPS w/ Maiden Head GS (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:44:38 -0600
There's also "Maidenhead" which was written by a ham's teenage son. Worth buying for a buck, just to support the kid. Not sure if Google Earth for iPhone could do what you're looking for, but it is a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00060.html (8,767 bytes)

199. Re: [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:49:05 -0700
We finally broke the 2-rovers-per-State average. In 1997 there were 722,330 licensed operators in the U.S. (cited properly at Wikipedia, feel free to update with newer number, it won't matter for thi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00013.html (12,399 bytes)

200. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rules question (not anything to do with the usual problems) (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:47:19 -0700
Only Multi-Op fixed stations and UNLIMITED Rovers are supposed to be able to use "spotting networks". Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontestin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00202.html (8,473 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu