Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nate@natetech.com: 207 ]

Total 207 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [VHFcontesting] VUCC Card Checking Question (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:00:54 -0700
Remember also that VUCC does allow you a "radius" for your operating location. Putting the 6-digit grid you're operating FROM might raise an uneducated card checker's eyebrows, but you can always sho
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00213.html (13,130 bytes)

142. Re: [VHFcontesting] HIGH POWER (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:43:38 -0700
The vehicle's voltage regulator "sees" both batteries as a "system" during charging. The isolator keeps you from running down the starting battery, by not allowing you to draw current from it by the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00216.html (12,708 bytes)

143. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] VUCC Card Checking Question (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:08:13 -0700
I think ARRL learned the hard way that they're not a software company. Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00226.html (9,485 bytes)

144. Re: [VHFcontesting] Lunch box roving (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:44:08 -0700
It's no different than borrowing or renting an enormous HF contesting station. All contesting is a function of someone's ego, and is often fueled by their wallet. Yours appears bruised. ;-) Nate What
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00032.html (8,330 bytes)

145. Re: [VHFcontesting] Lunch box roving (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:19:42 -0700
--Original Message-- Finally, I think a disservice has been done to a new operator. W6TAI may well be gifted and could have a bright future with VHF contesting. The truth is though, that she will lik
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00041.html (12,809 bytes)

146. Re: [VHFcontesting] Distance based contest rules (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:44:06 -0700
So we park one multi-band station on top of Pike's Peak @ 14,110' MSL (roughly 8000' HAAT), and one on Mt. Evans, and send rovers to every grid square that's line of sight in a radial pattern. Start
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00043.html (13,450 bytes)

147. Re: [VHFcontesting] VUAC proposal to ARRL (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:57:13 -0700
I believe you meant to say 1.2 GHz. 900 MHz is not an option for the Kenwood TS-2000 radio, AFAIK. Nate WY0X --Original Message-- From: vhfcontesting-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:vhfcontesting-boun
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00089.html (8,274 bytes)

148. Re: [VHFcontesting] VUAC proposal to ARRL (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:09:03 -0700
Thanks for sharing Jon. All this proposal appears to do is discourage people who want to operate 7 or more band rovers and work other rovers with that many bands. Sure, it'll force the grid-circlers
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00101.html (13,533 bytes)

149. Re: [VHFcontesting] Interpetation of VHF rule 2.3.3 (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:16:07 -0700
All the EME guys (going the other way on that path) can answer this question, of course. "The same as going the other direction." :-) Nate WY0X p.s. Yeah, I'm still lurking on the list even though I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00317.html (9,177 bytes)

150. Re: [VHFcontesting] June 2032 intergalatic vhf sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:15:19 -0700
I thought it accurately pointed out the truth. The winners will continue to find ways to win, even if it means buying a "used ICBM", no matter what the rules are. Thus, quit worrying about the rules,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00329.html (9,851 bytes)

151. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:19:47 -0700
Scheduling and time management for maximization of points is ALREADY a contest skill practiced by ALL of the winning multi-operator FIXED stations. Ask any WINNING multi-op station how many skeds the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00357.html (9,217 bytes)

152. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:25:55 -0700
When was the last time you saw a major radio manufacturer offer up rigs and marketing "sponsorship" as well as devote pages of their advertising to VHF+ contesting? They ALL support contesting and DX
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00358.html (8,850 bytes)

153. Re: [VHFcontesting] [OT] Urgent request - probably off-topic but please read... (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:08:29 -0700
Folks, I am not a spammer by trade or by choice in normal circumstances, but I BEG of you to please read this. If you are even a SMALL enthusiast of Aviation, Aerospace or anything related to breakin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00359.html (15,498 bytes)

154. Re: [VHFcontesting] An "eyeball" QSO party? (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:59:58 -0600
Same thing with bringing my "Lunchbox stations". This year we'll start small and bring my lunch and lunch for a few friends in small portable metal boxes that can be reloaded for next year. I figure
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00018.html (8,402 bytes)

155. Re: [VHFcontesting] Concerning Tilton's Rule (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:10:10 -0600
Actually they do not. Think "round-table" type operations. I don't have to sign with you before handing it over to a third party on a local repeater, for example. The FCC cares naught about QSO's, on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00058.html (8,133 bytes)

156. Re: [VHFcontesting] Concerning Tilton's Rule (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:11:05 -0600
"Inconsistency breeds contempt." :-) -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00059.html (7,915 bytes)

157. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fw: Re: Picking a Bone With Gene (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 16:58:46 -0600
On Mon, 4 May 2009 15:18:40 -0700 (PDT), "Gene Gabry" "Object: To work as many amateur stations in as many different 2 degrees by 1 degree grid squares as possible using authorized frequencies above
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00013.html (9,799 bytes)

158. Re: [VHFcontesting] Picking a Bone with Gene (Part 2) (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 14:12:55 -0600
I apologize if I over-reacted, I read it very quickly and then saw the on-list complaint and had a similar "impression" as the original poster. I don't think Gene really meant to I still disagree in
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00021.html (10,948 bytes)

159. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fw: Re: Picking a Bone With Gene (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 16:06:55 -0600
I didn't say that Gene. I said "if"... and I've already mentioned that I over-reacted which started from me not carefully reading the article, and then seeing an over-reaction from someone else -- wh
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00024.html (11,109 bytes)

160. Re: [VHFcontesting] June contest plans underway. 222 anyone? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 14:29:01 -0600
Pete, I can only speak for the Front Range side of things, but there are a number of high power 222 MHz stations in DM79 and DM89 that would be looking for you... About the only way that path would w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00059.html (9,153 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu