Mail Archive Search: <+from:ksjones@zoominternet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ksjones@zoominternet.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Use of dipoles for 6meter Ragchew & Contesting... (score: 1): Author: ksjones@zoominternet.net (ksjones); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:02 2003; I Just recently put up a 6m dipole at about 25' or so. Almost anything works good when the band is open and have been able to work HP and P4 among using a barefoot FT736R and this dipole. I built min; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00886.html (9,390 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Full Circle -- Why we operate (score: 1): Author: ksjones@zoominternet.net (ksjones); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:41 2003; It has been really enjoyable seeing these issues and their debate on the reflector. This has probably generated more VHF Contest reflector activity than most any other topic. Spread the word to other; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01595.html (12,467 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] 2002 June VHF analysis (score: 1): Author: ksjones@zoominternet.net (ksjones); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:52 2003; Not sure why, but I decided to download the whole 2002 June VHF database and look at a couple of things. I was curious how many people were (or were not) active on various bands, which sections were; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02435.html (7,358 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Use of dipoles for 6meter Ragchew & Contesting... (score: 1): Author: ksjones@zoominternet.net (ksjones); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:02 2003; I Just recently put up a 6m dipole at about 25' or so. Almost anything works good when the band is open and have been able to work HP and P4 among using a barefoot FT736R and this dipole. I built min; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2002-03/msg00021.html (9,389 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]