Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kr7o@vhfdx.com: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] New VHF+ contest rules and picking out certainbands (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:30:13 -0800
"The questions and responses here are not intended to apply to VHF+ contesting because there are many differences in the way HF and VHF+ contests are conducted." Just what we need, more layers of rul
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00030.html (20,858 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] cherry picking (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:40:16 -0800
And I frequently enter as a multi-op even though I am single op, because I disagree with the "one signal at a time" rule for single ops that was imposed when the HF based general competition rules we
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00031.html (9,715 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] JT65 Mode - QSOs valid? (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:40:33 -0800
Deep-search CAN be turned off. If you want to handicap yourself, you can choose not to use it and suffer the 3db or so advantage it offers. Deep search should not be a reason to not pursue JT65 if di
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00106.html (8,164 bytes)

24. [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:47:40 -0800
I am curious if anyone has done any comparisons of the built-in 6m capability of the SDR1000 vs the SDR1000 as an IF for a DEMI or SSB 6m transverter. I am particularly interested in strong signal ha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00106.html (7,362 bytes)

25. [VHFcontesting] KR7O ARRL VHF SS (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:46:32 -0800
ARRL VHF SWEEPSTAKES -- 2008 Call: KR7O Category: Limited Multi (KR7O + Packet) Power: High Power Band: All Band Mode: Mixed Mode State: CA Grid: DM07, SJV BAND QSO QSO PTS GRIDS 50 49 49 24 144 40 4
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00112.html (7,617 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] SDR1000 vs 6m xvtr (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:58:01 -0800
Thanks for your response Russ. Since I think you were the only person (I think) to reply to the reflector I will reply here also. Your response seems to be the consensus of the several replies I rece
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00116.html (10,651 bytes)

27. [VHFcontesting] Unscheduled contacts---Re: VHF contesting ethics questions (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:43:25 -0700
Has been available for a year or maybe more, for the JT65 mode. I don't know if Joe has any plans to implement it for the meteor scatter modes. With an SDR radio and waterfall display you can see pin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00210.html (9,993 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF contesting ethics questions (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:47:58 -0700
Let's not start the whole skimmer debate on VHFContesting also. Hasn't everyone had enough on CQ-Contest already??? 73, Robert KR7O/YB2ARO, DM07ba/OI52ee (ex. N7STU) kr7o@vhfdx.com www.vhfdx.com (KR7
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00212.html (9,064 bytes)

29. [VHFcontesting] Great job K5QE (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 12:38:54 -0700
It isn't often (if ever) that a 5 land station breaks a million points. Looks like the station is playing well. -- ARRL June VHF QSO Party Call: K5QE Operator(s): K5QE K5MQ N5KDA N5YA W5KDA K5YG Stat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00291.html (7,958 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:50:09 -0700
True, but there is no incentive (aside from a Q point and personal pleasure) to work more than one station in each DX grid. Once I have the grid, 20 additional contacts with that grid are the same va
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00340.html (9,441 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Antenna Coupling Issues (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:34:58 -0700
I have been happy with the ICE 6 and 2m bandpass filters and they are inexpensive. On 6m I run the 200w 50-50.5MHz filter after the radio and the 6KW filter after the 8877. On 2M I run the 200w filte
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00129.html (12,691 bytes)

32. Re: [VHFcontesting] about the grid circling group (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:59:42 -0700
N6TEB is a frequent rover and I always work him multiple times throughout the contests they enter. N6TEB/KE6HPZ go to great effort to work everyone possible and I worked them multiple times on every
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00253.html (10,291 bytes)

33. Re: [VHFcontesting] controversy (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:39:23 -0700
The funny thing is, the stations that are dominating now with their legal, but claimed by some "unethical" techniques will continue to win, whatever the rules are, because they will plan their operat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00358.html (9,356 bytes)

34. [VHFcontesting] KR7O CQWW VHF results (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:31:24 -0700
CQWW VHF Contest -- 2008 Call: KR7O Category: CHECKLOG Power: High Power Band: All Band Mode: Mixed Mode State: BAND QSO QSO PTS GRIDS 50 67 67 44 144 15 30 10 Totals 82 97 54 = 5238 This contest is
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00364.html (8,128 bytes)

35. [VHFcontesting] HORSE = DEAD. Lather, rinse, repeat. (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:03:52 -0800
With all the rehashed moaning on the VHF contesting, HF contesting, and Moon-net reflectors regarding this/that perceived contest problem I can't decide if I just want to unsubscribe from all of the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00065.html (9,197 bytes)

36. Re: [VHFcontesting] Type N crimpers? (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:17:17 -0800
I have been using the LMR400 crimp connectors for over 10 years and have only seen two failures of installed cables. One was on a surplus piece of cable at the swap meet that was visibly installed i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00027.html (9,778 bytes)

37. Re: [VHFcontesting] Great idea -- Kudos to Grid Pirates (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:18:30 -0800
I love how we are all presumed guilty unless we prove otherwise. For anyone here so bent on judging the logs, please contact KX9X and volunteer to be on the log checking group. If someone CHOOSES to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00036.html (10,656 bytes)

38. Re: [VHFcontesting] open logs ruling (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:12:34 -0800
OK, so here is the quote from when the rule was dropped. Sorry, I missed that the change was dropped, but I don't religiously follow what is going on in DXCC since I primarily operate 160M and VHF+.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00057.html (10,247 bytes)

39. Re: [VHFcontesting] Gremlins and this weekend's contest (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:30:11 -0800
I battled this for a while with my 706mkII. The problem is that Vsend/Hsend are bidirectional. Depending on the keying circuit in your external device, that device could look like a ground to the acc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00109.html (8,642 bytes)

40. [VHFcontesting] Thank you Wayne et al. (score: 1)
Author: kr7o@vhfdx.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:22:11 -0800
Thanks for all the contacts you and your group have added to my logs. I just did a quick scan of my log and find over 100 contacts (and I haven't been that active lately). Excluding the June contest,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00086.html (7,366 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu