Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kc2hiz@gmail.com: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Insights to Consider (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:04:04 -0400
As a computer guy, this is sort of up my alley. The League's scores web page is at http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/scores.html and from there, members can (tediously) look at scores turned
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00188.html (11,630 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Insights to Consider (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:51:22 -0400
I've received several very nice, polite notes explaining that the numbers I posted don't paint the entire picture, and I'd like to say that I agree! That was part of the idea behind posting the summa
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00191.html (8,765 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Vhf com. members (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:52:45 -0400
I'm a no-code tech <hangs head> who wants to be a Real General. About the only time I get to practice my CW is during VHF contests! I feel soooo sorry for the folks on the other end... Anyway, I rath
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00205.html (7,750 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] January rove (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:47:27 -0500
Despite the blizzard, I managed to activate 4 grids (FN32, FN33, FN22, FN23) during the January contest. I think that activity was very low; perhaps due to the weather. I I made virtually all of my 3
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-01/msg00051.html (6,814 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Activity (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:41:41 -0500
This January, during the blizzard, about the only people to give me QSOs while I was roving were the FM folks. I called CQ on 144.55 and 446.000 mostly. It was very much appreciated that people who n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00040.html (7,172 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] January VHF Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:05:55 -0400
Hi Steve, I wish I had some reasonable-sounding advice. At least you were scored in NTX instead of WTX, so you have that distinction. I'm the top rover in ENY by dint of having gone out - I'm the onl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00102.html (10,099 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:01:42 -0400
I don't have any real numbers to go on, so I'll use the number posted previously. 3 rovers, 2,000 QSOs each. If 3% of those 6,000 QSOs were outside the group, that makes 180 QSOs that the group made
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00005.html (8,576 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] How to increase my score, or why should I try? (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:15:08 -0400
I would have thought that a Contesting reflector would be used to discuss ways to increase one's score. I thought it somewhat odd that a fair amount of words were expended on the VHF Contesting refl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00121.html (15,558 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] How to increase my score, or why should I try? (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:03:20 -0400
Hello Kenneth, -snip Doesn't general contest rule 8 specifically allow club competition? Isn't the point that one wants one's own club to win the contest? I can understand this, which is why there ar
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00127.html (14,704 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] How to increase my score, or why should I try? (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:26:15 -0400
-snip Perhaps I wasn't as clear as I should have been. The club competition explicitly recognises that human beings like to help others. That we, as social folk like to help people we know. That alt
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00142.html (12,254 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] Altruism, or how I got started in contesting (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:04:00 -0400
I think this is on topic, because it describes how a 'shack on the belt' guy got going on VHF contesting. I got my Tech license in Jan 2001. First thing I did was buy a 2m HT. Not knowing even as muc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00156.html (11,986 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Using limited gear (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:40:19 -0400
This is a very interesting point because it directly bears on my situation. I am using 10GHz Gunn (wide band) gear loaned to me. As I understand it, the choice of IF is crucial to making contacts wi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00226.html (7,404 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] Pack Rovers meet ARRL contest objectives (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:41:02 -0400
Just as an FYI for folks following this thread, the IF rig I use (loaned to me - I'm looking to acquire one of my own) is a Yaesu FT-290RII. It transmits out of band. --buck ________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00231.html (9,172 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Using limited gear (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:55:20 -0400
Hi Tree, Well that's a relief, because I call CQ and contact everyone I can on every band. I take the rules seriously, and I'm not one to nit-pick them to try and work around the spirit of the compet
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00242.html (7,528 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] my stratergy (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:26:42 -0400
Thanks, Frank. I have a lot to learn! This one is one of those things where you have to do it for a while before you get the right balance between staying in a grid grabbing that last QSO or move to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00273.html (7,265 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:24:09 -0400
That's almost me. I can't get through to hardly anybody else, so I make sure I talk to a super contest station. My other option is to make QSOs with a super rover who can find me AND who has a micro
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00296.html (9,769 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Grid Circling (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:08:56 -0400
Amen. Punishing all rovers is not a good means to create contest activity. --buck KC2HIZ/r _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00440.html (8,485 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rule Change Discussion (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:52:20 -0400
I'd bet that if there was a mega/team rover category that the N6 rovers would enter it. I don't think they're out to destroy other WTX rovers, I think they want to have fun in their own way. A separ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00470.html (8,536 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rule Change Discussion (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:41:02 -0400
Hi Dave, I wasn't very clear, sorry. I'd rather leave the existing scoring and rules in place as they are today and add a test/mega/unlimited rover category for the biggest stations/teams to compete
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00478.html (9,410 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] Goal-Based Contest Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Buck Calabro <kc2hiz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:43:46 -0400
I think the debate can be summed up in the phrase 'stations that most deserve to win.' In other words what you (or I) think is 'the best station' and whom you (or I) think are the highest performing
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00483.html (11,354 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu