Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ka6amd@earthlink.net: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] The "Art" of VHF Contesting [Was: CaptivatingRovers] (score: 1)
Author: ka6amd@earthlink.net (KA6AMD)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:49 2003
Actually, there is one category in VHF contesting that is designed to be competitive for smaller stations. That is the QRP portable category. One thing to note is that west coast stations seem to hav
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02296.html (16,274 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: 902 vs 903 (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:43:07 -0700
I originally got my DEM 902 transverter with the 903 MHz crystal. Unfortunately here in the West, the frequency of choice is 902.1. The IF rig I was using was a TR-9000. The crystal sets up so that 9
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00018.html (11,537 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Switching Power Supplies (opinions) (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:04:51 -0700
I'm using the MFJ switcher. I decided to get it after looking at the noise specs in a QST review. After a couple of months the switching transistors died. I sent it back to MFJ where they replaced th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00161.html (11,440 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Biat Tee return loss (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:08:39 -0700
Hello David, The return loss spec is the essentially the SWR of the bias tee. This is a measure of the mismatch of the bias tee with the transmission line you are using. 10 dB means that the reflecti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00034.html (8,671 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contesting: Fixing the Grid Circling Problem (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 06:43:31 -0700
Hello Zack, There is already an ARRL contest that has all of this. Its the 10GHz contest. You exchange 6 digit grid coordinates, scoring is by distance, you have to be at least 1 km from other statio
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00045.html (13,806 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] roverroverrover (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:08:53 -0700
As I see it, the charter of this list is VHF Contesting; the whole captive rover / grid circling debate is legitmately a VHF Contesting issue. (Actually it only seems to be an issue in the VHF contes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00371.html (10,778 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Goal-Based Contest Scoring (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:43:44 -0700
Yikes! Are you going to provide an interactive web site to calculate the scores? While the goals are laudable, I disagree with some of the weights on the microwave bands. Why do 24GHz and up have a l
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00447.html (8,080 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Contest Robot and 903 mhz Q's (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:42:20 -0800
One of the cardinal rules of the computer world is that new implementations should be backwards compatible with older versions. Part of the Cabrillo spec is the "START-OF-LOG: version number" line. T
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00104.html (20,734 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest Tweaks? (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 13:06:04 -0700
My 2 cents on this is that there needs to be a little more differentiation for the higher frequencies. While six often has poor local propagation, it still has a much better possibility to open up fo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00107.html (7,952 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] DEM 903 transverter power output (score: 1)
Author: "KA6AMD" <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:05:36 -0700
I get about 10W as measured on an HP power meter. You have to be careful about construction and tuning to get 10W with this design. Erich KA6AMD _______________________________________________ VHFcon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00194.html (8,232 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 706MKII or Kenwood TS690 (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:05:23 -0700
John, I have both radios and they are really designed to do different things. I use the TS-690 in the house and the Icom 706 in the car. I use both when I go out mountaintopping in contests. The 690'
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00064.html (9,207 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] WAHOO - LoTW Double Whammy(and a half) (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:18:50 -0700
I definitely think that if LoTW supported VUCC, then a lot more VHFers would use it. I am currently converting all of my old paper logs to LoTW and got a QSL tonight from way back in 1979! 73, Erich
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00097.html (7,356 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:12:12 -0700
David, I have operated this class a lot. The rules prohibit the use of the home station and limit you to 10W. This puts the emphasis on antennas and location, location, location. Since I live in a ho
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00046.html (9,034 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] poll (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:05:48 -0800
While the ARRL might like to discontinue contesting, I think that their advertisers wouldn't let them. Who is it that buys the $20k tranceivers, the 120 ft towers, and the 2kW amps? Usually it is con
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00012.html (9,496 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] NY Times article on the end of CW for licencing (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:13:43 -0800
An interesting article in the NY Times on the FCC ending the requirement for CW in getting a ham license. http://news.com.com/Morse+Code+A+fading+signal/2100-1033_3-6146261.html?tag=nefd.top http://n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00007.html (7,121 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] How Portable is "Single Op Portable"? (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:45:52 -0800
You can see how portable my 6-band QRP portable station is here: http://home.earthlink.net/~ka6amd/Sep02 vhf1.jpg <http://home.earthlink.net/%7Eka6amd/Sep02%20vhf1.jpg> Erich KA6AMD _________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00138.html (8,687 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] "Portable" (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:35:07 -0800
As I live in a remote and semi-rare grid square, I need good sized antennas just to be heard in the Los Angeles area. The home QTH is in a valley surrounded by +5000ft mountains, so portable is the o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00029.html (8,020 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Simplex (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:19:48 -0700
For sideband, the calling frequencies are 50.125, 144.200, and 432.100. Erich KA6AMD _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00076.html (7,049 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2007 VHF QSO Party - Log Submission RobotIssues - W4SHG (score: 1)
Author: KA6AMD <ka6amd@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:44:31 -0700
Does anyone know where you can get the updated spec that the ARRL is using? I wrote my own contest logger and need to update to the new format. Erich KA6AMD DM15 _____________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00093.html (8,478 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu