Mail Archive Search: <+from:dtrammel@hiwaay.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dtrammel@hiwaay.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Re: Icom vs. Yaesu question (score: 1): Author: dtrammel@hiwaay.net (Don T. "AI4CW"); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:15 2003; Normal CW is LSB on the rig because that's the way it is on HF and the rig is a HF rig with the VHF/UHF added into it as an afterthought/bonus to compete with the other HF+6M rigs. No big deal; at le; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00630.html (12,186 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] Re: Icom vs. Yaesu question (score: 1): Author: dtrammel@hiwaay.net (Don T. "AI4CW"); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:15 2003; Great page, Bill! I'll have to study on it a bit before finalizing my antenna setup. I'm mainly planning to set up for HF mobile with a hitch mount mast, but the joy of that is that it can be easily; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00634.html (15,213 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] Re: Icom vs. Yaesu question (score: 1): Author: dtrammel@hiwaay.net (Don T. "AI4CW"); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:15 2003; I can only speak for my Icoms; they've always operated that way. They do select LSB normally for HF below 20M and USB for 20M & up if you're using SSB. My normal HF operations are QRP on 40/30M, so t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00635.html (10,264 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Contest rules revamp (score: 1): Author: dtrammel@hiwaay.net (Don T. "AI4CW"); Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:19 2003; How about a QRP class that allows home QTH operations at low power? No reason that the only QRP category should be portable. Low Power is great for all of the stations that have the 100W multiband ri; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01270.html (8,424 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]