Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:alex@kr1st.com: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 result and comments (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:10:28 -0400
Hi Paul, How far up/down the band (2 meters) do you tune and/or watch if using a band scope? I usually have the bands cope/panadapter cover from just below .140 to just above .300. This will allow me
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00051.html (7,882 bytes)

22. [VHFcontesting] ARRL Jan VHF KR1ST SO 3Band LP (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:04:07 -0500
ARRL January VHF Contest Call: KR1ST Operator(s): KR1ST Station: KR1ST Class: SO 3Band LP QTH: FN21 Operating Time (hrs): 12 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 6: 95 18 2: 44 11 222: 432: 16 6 -- Total: 155
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-01/msg00058.html (8,792 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 contest mode incompatibly (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:33:13 -0400
I did exactly the same, and it seemed to resolve the problem every time. I also noticed that quite a number of operators were savvy enough to advance their messages manually when needed. 73, --Alex K
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-07/msg00051.html (9,006 bytes)

24. [VHFcontesting] Why not ask? (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 17:05:36 -0400
I'm a bit puzzled why folks don't ask if anyone else is on frequency before moving on to the next band? I find myself missing out of a bunch of contacts with folks I know I can easily work simply bec
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-08/msg00001.html (7,009 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital and VHF contests (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:54:49 -0400
Hi John, If you would want to assign different QSO points based on mode, then you would have to weigh grid multipliers by mode as well. Working a distant grid on CW is a lot easier than on SSB, for i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00074.html (9,599 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] [NEWSVHF] CQ frequency advice? (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 15:13:56 -0400
Called FM Friday I believe. :) 73, --Alex KR1ST _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vh
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00095.html (21,541 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] How to Sell VHF/UHF/Microwave Equipment (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 12:42:38 -0500
Hi Tom, Just post the list. Folks will complain no matter what you do. The swap meet forum on QRZ.com is good and also the QTH Classifieds site. The latter has specific VHF/UHF categories. I consider
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-02/msg00013.html (8,690 bytes)

28. [VHFcontesting] VHF QSO party opportunity? Was: Hamvention 2020 has been cancelled (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:47:23 -0400
Perhaps this is an opportunity to organize/schedule a VHF QSO party for May 16 and 17 (CQP?) like the Veron in the Netherlands is organizing after one of the largest hamfests over there has been canc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-03/msg00018.html (8,425 bytes)

29. [VHFcontesting] 2M Spring Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 12:19:03 -0400
144 MHz Spring Sprint - 2020 Call: KR1ST Operator(s): KR1ST Station: KR1ST Class: Single Op HP QTH: FN21 Operating Time (hrs): 3.5 Summary: Total: QSOs = 34 Mults = 11 Total Score = 374 Club: Mt Airy
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-04/msg00007.html (7,760 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] Want to run the bands on FT8? (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 19:57:54 -0400
Try adding a bit of feedline. I know SWR is supposed to be the same along a feedline, but still, try it. Maybe adding a short jumper is all you need to make your amp happy. 73, --Alex KR1ST On 2020-0
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00030.html (9,314 bytes)

31. [VHFcontesting] WTB Gemini 23cm amp (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 18:17:24 -0400
Hi there, If anyone is thinking of selling his or her Gemini 23cm amp, please shoot me a note. Thanks and 73, --Alex KR1ST _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list V
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00031.html (8,663 bytes)

32. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 16:33:05 -0400
Hi Mark, I was on only a very limited amount of time but I worked 30 FT4 stations vs 78 on FT8 on 6m. Of course I'm on the other side of NA so things may be different here. Like you, I constantly kee
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00066.html (8,958 bytes)

33. Re: [VHFcontesting] PA MD DE CT RI MA (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:06:21 -0400
I never worked MS on 222, but more than happy to try. I run a little over 100W into 10 elements. It's a peanut whistle I know. 73, --Alex KR1ST FN21 (PA) _____________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-08/msg00011.html (7,100 bytes)

34. Re: [VHFcontesting] 3456 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:05:09 -0400
This was an auction for licences for the 3.55-3.60GHz band which is above the Amateur Radio band that ends at 3.50 MHz, so I wouldn't think that this particular auction has any consequences for Amate
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-09/msg00001.html (8,587 bytes)

35. [VHFcontesting] N4WLO on 50.230 MSK144 for over 26 hours? (score: 1)
Author: alex@kr1st.com
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:38:34 -0500
Is this some sort of MS/Geminids experiment? I've been seeing N4WLO transmitting "VV N4WLO EM50" for, what I assume, 26 hours now on both sequences. 73, --Alex KR1ST _________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-12/msg00003.html (6,723 bytes)

36. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Test 3 Band Category - long rant better delete!! (score: 1)
Author: alex@kr1st.com
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:34:34 -0500
Hi Herb, I agree. These contests have been minimized in significance (cheapened?) to a level that they cannot be seriously considered competitive events anyway. I call them activity weekends. They ar
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00087.html (11,425 bytes)

37. Re: [VHFcontesting] A comment for those turning in their mics due to FT8 (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:01:48 -0500
Many of the folks who are asking for change are currently on the digital modes. Look at your digital mode logs. The contingency of digital mode operators would shrink if they'd sign off. I'd certainl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00100.html (10,133 bytes)

38. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: alex@kr1st.com
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:02:28 -0500
I think the best approach is a separate contest for digital modes. It's done on HF, and it's done in other countries. This is not terribly difficult. The points per mode approach is doomed to fail I'
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00137.html (10,140 bytes)

39. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:10:20 -0500
Hi Jay, You may very well be right, but I'm hopeful they are paying attention to lists like this one and read the 3830 comments as well. It is of course our obligation to make them aware of the issue
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00146.html (13,270 bytes)

40. Re: [VHFcontesting] Portable FT8 Was: FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: alex@kr1st.com
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:00:28 -0500
Hi Zack, I'd be interested in those suggestions as well because I'm on a similar quest, but for a IC-705. So far it seems to me that something like a surface type tablet is the best option. It will r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00162.html (9,700 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu