Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Ray@w9ray.org: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Contests Rules... (score: 1)
Author: Ray@w9ray.org (Ray Johnson)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:48 2003
I fail to see where it states in the contest rules that Digital modes are not allowed... Many hundreds of digital mode contacts are made every contest. Actually the rules say nothing about modes you
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02274.html (12,241 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] what spam? (score: 1)
Author: "Ray J , W9RAY" <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:45:13 -0600
Am I missing something? I get no spam here... _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00179.html (6,529 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Rover rules...?? (score: 1)
Author: "Ray J , W9RAY" <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:33:23 -0600
I don't Know if this would be of interest to the discussion or not... A person here in our club (Northern Lights Radio Society) Tried to rove with 4 family members on a trip .. his logs were denied..
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00058.html (8,272 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: VHFcontesting] AM6154 Surplus amps found.. (score: 1)
Author: "Ray J" <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:57:29 -0500
All kinds of these just sold on ebay for $150.. most still in the Faa packing EBAY vultures??? whos charging $200-$500 next week. These are UNMODIFIED and right out of the FAA warehouse storage in OK
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00156.html (8,040 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] New to 6 (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:23:49 -0500
hello.. i also use a ft920 on 6, I had a 706 2g and i really beg to differ.... the706 can not even compare to the 920... but it will do 2 and 432, which are 2 bands u "need" to do vhf contesting .. n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00071.html (7,777 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Informal FD VHF+ Challenge (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 06:28:07 -0500
more food for thought..... the rules state "*Extra VHF Station:* Any Class A entry whose category is two or more transmitters may also operate one additional transmitter if it operates exclusively on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00105.html (8,555 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:45:40 -0500
I do believe that the only frequency that you can not use is 146.52 I have not seen any other "outlawed" frequencies... here locally, over a dozen contacts can be made on 146.58 and 446.00 FM durring
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00123.html (7,669 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Using FM on VHF contests (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:00:56 -0500
"1.9.Only recognized FM simplex frequencies may be used, such as 144.90 to 145.00; 146.49, .55 and .58, and 147.42, .45, .48, .51, .54 and .57 MHz on the 2-meter band. " you cannot transmit "simplex"
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00132.html (7,780 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Antenna-WA6MBL (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:29:36 -0500
How are u mounting the yagi now? tripod? vent pipe? u have a rotor? what radio do u have? and most importantly what are your expectations of the band? If its simple for u to go up 5 more feet... go f
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-06/msg00071.html (9,544 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:21:16 -0500
the arrl does not want you to use digipeaters or internet gateways .. the use of simplex aprs is just fine.. it has been oked for use in the arrl contests http://w2ev.rochesterny.org/HamIM/HamIM.htm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00032.html (7,907 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] [Moon-net] Changes in the 2005 ARRL InternationalEME Competition (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 16:40:00 -0500
Why didnt they just say that single op assisted stations can use the JT65EME chat page durring the contest... That is all that this is about.... http://www.chris.org/cgi-bin/jt65eme Ray J W9RAY _____
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00091.html (9,165 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwd: Re: VHF Contesting: Fixing the Grid Circling (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 18:09:28 -0500
Yep.. thats the whole point of the contest..... to make q's and mults...... u need something to do a 3:00 am.... you mise well be making q's a 1000 miles out.. Its quite obvious you have not used ws
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00108.html (10,564 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] EME in VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:09:47 -0500
I have never heard of anyone making an eme contact for a vhf contest qso...... but then again i have never asked... A local ham here has 4x18xxx on eme and it works quite well.... The last eme contes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00129.html (8,767 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:37:52 -0500
At LEAST have something better than the 'blurry photograph of bigfoot' type of evidence that seems to exist so far... their website says they did something like this in the 1970s.... "They introduced
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00328.html (17,995 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] repairing a transverter (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:26:02 -0600
I would think that the mixer is the first thing in line to be killed, unless you are running the low drive option where there is a mmic amp in the tx IF line then that might have died... Ray J W9RAY
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-12/msg00017.html (7,271 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] need advice/ft-847 and demi transverters (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:07:40 -0500
you can get the ppt signal form the hf data I/O jack/**//**// <http://www.packetradio.com/bbb/CBL%203.gif>**/ or from the STBY port.. Which band transvertser are you planning on? 10 meter in or 2 met
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-05/msg00039.html (8,330 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 746 as contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:41:03 -0500
what do you want to compare it to? and what you expect it to do.. one of the best contest setups would be DB6NT or Down East Microwave transverters hooked to a good hf radio such as a Icom7800,or a f
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00151.html (8,789 bytes)

18. Re: [VHFcontesting] HD Chimney Bracket (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:17:07 -0600
ha ha Ev, Its not April first yet.... you are kidding right.... W9Ray _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00003.html (7,727 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedence of 8" long bulkhead @ VHF/UHF? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:26:49 -0600
the swr problem is due the fact that these connectors are not made to be 50 ohms at vhf frequency's.. I would think that the center tube is too big of a diameter.. but i don't know much about these t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00031.html (15,978 bytes)

20. Re: [VHFcontesting] 1296 (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:04:01 -0600
other than spending big $$$ on a preamp you should probably look around for better Coax.. Bury flex is not a Low loss cable... at 1296 anyway.. you are looking at a 6.8 db loss this is going to take
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00073.html (8,484 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu