Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K4GUN@comcast.net: 138 ]

Total 138 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers for June & APRS (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:36:50 +0000
I'm going to try it this time. I didn't have it in January and I'll be curious to see how much it helps versus potential problems on 2 meter SSB. Steve K4GUN/R _______________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00049.html (7,681 bytes)

62. [VHFcontesting] K4GUN/R Roving plans (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 15:09:43 +0000
After reviewing the rover plans for a couple of other rovers who are running a LOT more power than I am, I have changed my plans. I'm going to run essentially the same route as I did in January, with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00050.html (8,881 bytes)

63. [VHFcontesting] More K4GUN/R plans (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:12:42 +0000
It has been pointed out to me that I need to be a bit more specific about times for my rover route. This is difficult because a few of the stops are going to be very brief and two of the stops will b
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00087.html (8,393 bytes)

64. [VHFcontesting] 540 miles... (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:25:31 +0000
I'm still assessing everything that happened and was learned this weekend. What an amazing adventure! I'm going to post a complete soapbox soon, but for now, here's the recap. 251 QSOs and 81 multipl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00150.html (7,322 bytes)

65. [VHFcontesting] Claimed score for K4GUN/R (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:53:21 +0000
RoverLog QSOs by Activated Grid: Grid QSOs Grid QSOs Grid QSOs FM27 16 FM18 32 FM19 5 FM28 10 FM29 17 FM16 23 FM07 28 FM26 3 FM17 21 FM08 96 RoverLog Score Summary, Using new rover rules: Band QSOs V
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00167.html (6,865 bytes)

66. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:09:36 +0000
First of all... wow. I was away from my computer yesterday and this morning, there are 80 messages in my box and almost all are from this reflector. Next, I don't see what the bru-haha is about with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00270.html (9,522 bytes)

67. [VHFcontesting] Somebody eat my moxon! (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:43:37 +0000
I don't know who did it, but I know where it happened... roughly. Some hungry tree in Delaware feasted upon my Par Electronics Stressed Moxon. I knew it was only a matter of time. It was right at 13'
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00276.html (8,122 bytes)

68. Re: [VHFcontesting] Somebody eat my moxon! (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:45:15 +0000
Ate... somebody ate my moxon. I swear, I really can spell. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00277.html (8,440 bytes)

69. [VHFcontesting] APRS in the June contest (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:34:31 +0000
I had APRS for most of the VHF contest and I'm pretty sure it did absolutely no good for me. None of the big gun stations seemed to be using the data to aim their antennas my way. Even after reaching
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00282.html (7,525 bytes)

70. Re: [VHFcontesting] Great job K5QE (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:49:09 +0000
Well, they got me from FM17 and FM27. I think there were only 4 or 5 total operators in FM27 all weekend and all were rovers. K5QE and a few other big gun stations in the Gulf Coast area seemed to ha
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00296.html (8,784 bytes)

71. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:29:37 +0000
Think a little more about the Rovers. I made many contacts while in motion and could not have even guessed what my 6 digit grid was. Even at stops, unless it was one that I had planned in advance, I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00312.html (11,049 bytes)

72. Re: [VHFcontesting] W4IY June VHF (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:35:39 +0000
LOL... that would explain it. Steve - K4GUN/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00314.html (8,088 bytes)

73. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:17:07 +0000
I really think y'all are making this more complicated than it needs to be. The current grid multiplier system rewards distance contacts anyway. It might not be set up to maximize one person's score,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00322.html (10,710 bytes)

74. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:09:19 +0000
Excellent points. Here's another one for you. Would a rover be able to make more contacts each time he moves into a new 6 digit grid? Could I start fresh when I move from FM18iq to FM18ip? How do you
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00331.html (11,330 bytes)

75. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter - distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:51:51 +0000
First of all, can somebody explain what we're really talking about? How exactly would a distance based scoring system work? I must say that the people who have been posting in favor of this, with one
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00347.html (18,348 bytes)

76. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:12:52 +0000
Here's another thought. If we go to 6 digit grids, I'll just stay in FM08 and slowly work my way down Skyline Drive. I only have to drive to the next sub-grid to start all over again. I'll never have
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00350.html (12,424 bytes)

77. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:55:32 +0000
No one ever said that, but then again, until Ev spoke up, nobody had ANY specifics. Everybody keeps talking about use of 6 digit squares as if the current 4 digit is inadequate. That's why I asked fo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00357.html (10,207 bytes)

78. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:24:20 +0000
I appreciate all the responses. I genuinely am open, and some of these notes do make sense. I haven't changed my mind, but I'm still listening. I like the current system. I like that I can go to a di
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00362.html (15,128 bytes)

79. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fixed antennas and indoor installations (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:00:48 +0000
That's a good idea. For that matter, since weight isn't an issue, you could use a 2x4 as your boom. Heck, if the house was situated the correct way, you could build it into the cross members of the r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00430.html (11,728 bytes)

80. [VHFcontesting] Camelback Mountain? (score: 1)
Author: k4gun@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:04:28 +0000
I'm already looking ahead to the September VHF QSO Party and am looking for new places in different grids. I think I've about had it with the Virginia Beach area. Its just too flat and its too diffic
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00001.html (7,398 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu