Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*coax\s+balun\s+on\s+PVC\s+form\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*coax\s+balun\s+on\s+PVC\s+form\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. coax balun on PVC form? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 06:43:27 -0700; I recently read an article that says that coax baluns work much better, particularly at lower frequencies, when wound flat on some sort of tubular form rather than "bundled" as we typically do. The a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00104.html (7,219 bytes)
2. coax balun on PVC form? (score: 1): Author: bigdon@eskimo.com (Big Don); Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 09:24:00 -0700 (PDT); It is possible to make these without a form by strategic use of electrical tape. On our 40-2CD, the balun is built exactly according to the instructions (12 turns on a 6" dia) in a "flat wound" confi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00106.html (7,359 bytes)
3. coax balun on PVC form? (score: 1): Author: eyg@hpnjlc.njd.hp.com (Ed Gilbert); Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 08:40:24 -0400; Hi Pete, My experience is that PVC works fine as a form for high Q RF coils. I've measured Qs of up to 450 on loading coils wound on PVC pipe. I've appended a paper I wrote on measurements of coaxial; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00107.html (15,336 bytes)
4. coax balun on PVC form? (score: 1): Author: account_custodian@ntsqm1.uswc.uswest.com (account custodian); Date: 12 Aug 1996 11:11:37 -0600; Mail*Link(r) SMTP coax balun on PVC form? I recently read an article that says that coax baluns work much better, particularly at lower frequencies, when wound flat on some sort of tubular form rathe; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00109.html (9,007 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]