Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Safe\s+crank\s+up\s+work\?\s+$was\:\s+Crank\-up\s+mishap$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Safe\s+crank\s+up\s+work\?\s+$was\:\s+Crank\-up\s+mishap$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Safe crank up work? (was: Crank-up mishap) (score: 1): Author: ke1fo@contesting.com (Alfred J. Frugoli); Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:32:20 +0000; I use an extention ladder while the tower is "fully retracted". I lower the tower as far as the limit switch will allow, then I place the ladder on the lowest section, and never on any of the higher; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00273.html (9,653 bytes)
2. Safe crank up work? (was: Crank-up mishap) (score: 1): Author: bipi@worldnet.att.net (bipi@worldnet.att.net); Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:53:21 -0800; I lower the tower, block all sections independantly leaving some tension in the cables and climb it. I feel as safe doing this as leaning a latter up against it. Most extension ladders scare the hell; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00280.html (11,025 bytes)
3. Safe crank up work? (was: Crank-up mishap) (score: 1): Author: henry@rio.com (henry@rio.com); Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 21:55:50 -0800 (PST); my tower, when nested fully, has each section resting on cross braces at the bottom of the tower. the sections can't move down at all, just up. the cables have no tension at all. i don't understand w; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00289.html (7,761 bytes)
4. Safe crank up work? (was: Crank-up mishap) (score: 1): Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths); Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 16:21:37 -0800 (PST); tower from the I hate to disagree with you, Mike, but considering all of the crankup horror stories I have heard, I must. Each new story tells of yet another way a crankup can "get you". I am convin; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00310.html (10,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]