Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Guy\s+Wire\s+Spacing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Guy\s+Wire\s+Spacing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Guy Wire Spacing (score: 1): Author: kb2hun@wizvax.net (William R Liporace); Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 12:25:40 -0400 (EDT); I am a little confused about guy wire distances from the base to the anchor. I know that Rohn reccomends 80% of the height. I have heard as little as 30% of height. I am planning on a 80' tower(Rohn2; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00050.html (6,991 bytes)
2. Guy Wire Spacing (score: 1): Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher); Date: Mon, 5 Aug 1996 12:55:59 -0400; Hi Will I did a similar short-guying thing on my tower. I was too close to a property line on one guy. Under the advice of a PE, I did the following: The tower was 70 feet of Rohn 45. The Rohn book c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00051.html (7,070 bytes)
3. Guy Wire Spacing (score: 1): Author: morgan@speckle.ncsl.nist.gov (Roy Morgan); Date: Mon, 05 Aug 1996 14:00:15 -0400; I am Bill, Consider two possibilities: A) Guys are more out of the way, but don't work too well. In a high wind one day, the tower falls over, maybe on the house. Imagine level of discontent. B) Guys; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00052.html (7,025 bytes)
4. Guy Wire Spacing (score: 1): Author: JimP911@aol.com (JimP911@aol.com); Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 20:08:45 -0400; The Rohn book recommends 3 guys @ 25, 50 and 75 feet with the guy anchor 64' from the base. These lengths are the same for 70 and 90 MPH ratings. 73 -- Jim KC1SJ; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-08/msg00067.html (6,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]