Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+lightning\-slightly\s+off\s+topic\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com (FireBrick)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 06:21:53 -0500
But you may find this interesting. You'll notice the water tower in the background isn't hit. http://lightning.pwr.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp/lrg/temp/plane.html -- Practice safe eating- always use condiments
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00183.html (7,745 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@earthlink.net (Robert Shohet)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:42:10 -0400
Reminds me of the time when myself, W7WA and K1ZM were on a plane approaching Zurich on the way to WRTC2000 in Slovenia. It was very dark and drizzly, and getting turbulent descending below 9,000 fee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00184.html (8,306 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 07:13:35 -0500
Amazing! I wonder how many times a year planes get hit and I wonder what it does to the avionics. I know on a sailboat it can do all sorts of bad things to the instruments. I wonder on a plane, how t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00185.html (8,228 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: va3pl@cuic.ca (VeeAthreePL - VA3PL)
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 11:18:22 -0400
Oh yeah....the water tower could be miles ahead in the forefgound..... Andy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00187.html (8,583 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: k3bz@arrl.net (Jerry Keller)
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 11:29:48 -0400
A "well-grounded tower" DOESN'T get hit? I thought lightning always takes the EASIEST path to ground. Isn't proper grounding of the tower designed to provide an easier path for lightning into the gro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00188.html (9,454 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 10:55:55 -0500
I think what's missing here is perspective. It's hard to tell how much distance separates the tower and the plane. That the tower, which would be rather small, compared to the plane, appears as big o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00189.html (11,685 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: na9d@speakeasy.net (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 23:19:01 -0500
At the same time though, grounding helps to eliminate static buildup on a tower or object. Preventing charge buildup helps prevent strikes. So it does a dual purpose. It does indeed help to ward off
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00203.html (8,061 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] lightning-slightly off topic (score: 1)
Author: bhider@y2marketing.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:33:58 -0400
Planes get hit dozens of times/year and they're designed to take it. Nothing happens to the avionics. There's no difference of potential across the equipment. The charge is quickly disappointed. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00245.html (10,197 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu