Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+W9INN\s+Broadband\s+160\/80\/40\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+W9INN\s+Broadband\s+160\/80\/40\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] W9INN Broadband 160/80/40 (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 12:19:48 -0400; There is some confusion on the W9INN antennas. The antenna labeled "Broadband" has two flavors. There is a 160/80 version and a 160/80/40 version. This antenna does not require a tower to complete th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00819.html (8,185 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] W9INN Broadband 160/80/40 (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 20:15:14 -0400; Hi dave, I'm confused by this. If it is a dual-sloper isolated from the tower, then it is really a dipole or a bent-up Inverted V dipole isn't it? To be "tower independent" would require two wires ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00833.html (8,182 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]