Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\.\s+HF2V\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Re\.\s+HF2V\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: RTTYMAN@aol.com (RTTYMAN@aol.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 18:35:02 EDT; My experience is with one on an elevated (chimney strap) type of insulated mount. It well outperformed a GAP Titan at the same height on 80 & 40 meters. I used 4 elevated radials on 80 and 6 on Forty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00142.html (7,829 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:39:18 -0600; Interesting results. NN6K 80M DXCC = 80 countries with HF2V KZ4V 80M DXCC = 280 countries with inverted vee at 90 ft (NE/SW) and vertically polarized Delta Loop at 90 ft (NW / SE) N4KG 80M DXCC = 322; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00143.html (9,731 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:39:18 -0600; Interesting results. NN6K 80M DXCC = 80 countries with HF2V KZ4V 80M DXCC = 280 countries with inverted vee at 90 ft (NE/SW) and vertically polarized Delta Loop at 90 ft (NW / SE) N4KG 80M DXCC = 322; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00144.html (9,875 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 21:40:32 -0400; While it makes good marketing hype, the number of countries worked has little to do with transmitting antenna performance, unless something is seriously wrong. One reason so many people have dismal r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00147.html (9,419 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: k6sdw@hotmail.com (Eddy Avila); Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 02:52:49 +0000; Right on Tom! _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00148.html (9,557 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 22:14:22 -0600; N4KG comments inserted below. On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 21:40:32 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: N4KG: For the most part, this is true, until you reach 250-280 and have to work over the pole; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00151.html (11,402 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:24:37 -0400; I've rarely is even worked over the poles on any band below 40 meters. For example, the normal path from here to Mongolia is SE in the evening and SW in the morning. Same for deep Russia and India o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00152.html (14,027 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 08:53:53 -0600; On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 07:24:37 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: N4KG: I meant countries *located* over the pole. I recognize that the signals actually diverge around the poles or come LP.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00162.html (16,936 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: i4jmy@iol.it (Maurizio Panicara); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 17:00:09 +0200; When one uses a very short vertical radiator, rarely it happens that a good and extensive RF ground system is instead available. All considerations about nearly good grounds and antenna loading are m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00163.html (16,804 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:13:30 -0400; Don't know. I'd sure try one or something else vertical with a chance of working (NOT a Gap or similar no-radial or small radial system dummy load) if I was serious about doing the best I could with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00172.html (11,637 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE); Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 10:28:19 -0700; I always thought that the radiation comes from the place where the current is the highest, ie at thepoint of feed for a dipole and a 1/4 wl. Hence the further away from the feed point (to limits of c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00174.html (9,585 bytes)
12. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 14:24:53 -0400; Radiation is a directly tied to ampere-feet of the antenna, where the sections carry currents whose radiation fields add in phase. As we make an antenna shorter for a given amount of applied power (; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00175.html (10,043 bytes)
13. [Towertalk] Re. HF2V (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 15:52:10 -0600; On Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:13:30 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: N4KG: EVERYTHING seems to work better to Europe from GA than from ALA :-( My HIGH Dipoles seem to play better to Central EU; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00176.html (12,492 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]