Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+F12\s+C4XL\s+or\s+C4SXL\s+Which\s+to\s+buy\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+F12\s+C4XL\s+or\s+C4SXL\s+Which\s+to\s+buy\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 14:44:06 +0000; Fellow towertalkians, regarding Jims questions; Am I right in assuming that the F12 yagis are designed for 20, 15 and 10 mtrs and 17/12 mtrs only work because there is a load at the end of the coax a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00051.html (9,948 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: sm2cew@telia.com (Peter Sundberg); Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 07:11:52 +0000; Hi Tom. Yes, I understand that, but my point is that advertising the antenna as a 5 bander opens up the opportunity to do the same thing for virtually any antenna as anything at the end of a coax wil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00065.html (12,655 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 08:17:32 -0500; Hi Peter -- I may not have given them enough credit. Here's what Force 12 claims for the C-3, and I have always found their specifications to be honest: BAND GAIN NET GAIN F/B SWR 14.000-14.350 12.6d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00067.html (9,125 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 07:30:52 -0600; The difference between using the Force 12 antennas on the WARC bands and most others is that there are NO Resonant traps in the F12 antennas and NO Tuned Matching Systems at the feedpoint. The only l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00068.html (11,382 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: jimsmith@shaw.ca (Jim Smith); Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 10:49:00 -0800; Well, thanks to all for your comments, both direct and here. Some suggested I should go higher than the approx 50 ft and that the larger antenna, the better. I didn't describe the tower situation as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00078.html (10,037 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: clewis@knology.net (Chuck Lewis); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:10:20 -0600; Peter, I'll leave the theoretical discussions to you, Tom, and others; my comments address only claims, performance, customer satisfaction, and implied ethics (or lack thereof). See below: -- Origina; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00084.html (10,133 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] F12 C4XL or C4SXL Which to buy? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:55:27 -0600; Good idea. Sounds reasonable. True. An amp will give you more gain than a beam. 400/100W = 6 dB 800/100W = 9 dB 1000/100W = 10 dB 1600 / 100W = 12 dB Maybe, maybe not. I've worked over 320 countries; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00092.html (9,261 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]