Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Double\s+posts\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+Double\s+posts\.\.\.\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: k6rix@arrl.net (Dino Darling); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:57:49 -0800; Am I the only person getting double posts from this list? Maybe a little manual editing is needed before hitting the send button! Also, since I subscribe to this list, just responding to the list wou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00489.html (8,809 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: contesting@eircom.net (Tim Makins, EI8IC); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:52:27 -0000; I agree, and suspect that many interesting comments are lost to the group because a person gets into the habit of pressing 'Reply' rather than 'Reply All'. The email goes to the original poster, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00493.html (8,312 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: htodd@twofifty.com (Hisashi T Fujinaka); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:33:50 -0800 (PST); The way the software is set up (I am confirming it now) the reply goes to you and the cc goes to the list. I'm giving you another double here for testing purposes. If you want it changed, ask Steve.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00494.html (10,289 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:47:45 -0500; Yes, everyone please consider whether your response to a list posting should go to the list and not just to the sender. But please let's not make that the default -- I belong to only one list where i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00496.html (8,233 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: ag0n@arrl.net (ag0n@arrl.net); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 17:04:35 -0700; It's easier than that. Just create an alias called tt (or whatever you want). Then highlight the To field and type tt. I think all lists should reply to the list. If you want to include the originato; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00506.html (7,923 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (WW3S); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:10:44 -0500; I'm not sure the problem is the reply to; I seem to be getting the same message, usually a few days after the first one was posted. Anyone else seeing this? get sense without hear a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00510.html (10,229 bytes)
7. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:19:38 -0500; This is frequently a function of mail server problems. Somebody fixes and reboots the mail server and, rather than maybe lose outgoing mail, decides to send everything on the last back-up tape again.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00511.html (7,927 bytes)
8. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:41:58 -0500; Yes. I've been getting duplicate messages from Towertalk for many weeks, or months. Sometimes the second message arrives on the heels of the first; and sometimes it comes days later, as you've experi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00513.html (8,270 bytes)
9. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:46:14 -0500; Awww. :-( Thinking of HAL and Col. Kurtz was so comforting. Why'd you have to pop my balloon? You're not going to tell us next that there's no Santa Claus -- I hope. I have my heart set on a new towe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00514.html (7,946 bytes)
10. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: llindblom@juno.com (Larry L Lindblom); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 02:46:02 +0000; RR, I've notice a few here that appear a 2nd time several days after. Maybe it has something to do with the ISP the message originates from. W0ETC; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00515.html (11,733 bytes)
11. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1): Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths); Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:47:51 -0800; I like it the way it is. I have been on another list that was the way you are suggesting and the result was tons of "junk" responses to the entire list that should only have gone to the sender. I don; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00520.html (7,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]