Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Towertalk\]\s+45G\s+\(guyed\)\s+vs\.\s+SSV\s+\(self\-supp\'g\)\s+70\-ft\.\s+tower\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:36:48 -0400
Thanks to all the Towertalkers, including K7LXC , N4KG, N6IN/2, K1MK, N8KU, W5FL, AD3F, AA1K, K8LX, W4EF, and W9RMA, who so generously shared their knowledge of this topic with me, off-list as well a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00031.html (8,158 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@easystreet.com (Stan & Patricia Griffiths)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:56:53 -0700
If you guyed a 70 foot 45G at 4 levels and put the top set at the top, it would hold a HUGE load. I can't calculate how much since I am not an engineer, but you should find one and suggest this confi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00052.html (13,421 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:20:05 -0600
Doesn't this drawing for R45 also ASSUME an 8 sq ft side mount (for dish antennas)? IF that is the case, and you do NOT install the dish mount, you can add ~8 sq ft to the rated load for R45. And YES
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00058.html (9,507 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 07:24:42 -0600
I guyed an 80 ft TV tower at 4 levels and another 75 footer at 3 levels. I can't imagine guying 70 ft of R45 at 4 levels. Maybe 3 for a really strong installation, otherwise 2 levels should be adequa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00059.html (15,716 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 09:43:06 EDT
Rohn specs aren't "super conservative" - they merely conform to standards such as the TIA-222. The published Rohn tower specs and configurations are for commercial applications where you may have ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00061.html (8,761 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:45:32 -0400
According to Rohn's spec sheets, either a 45G guyed tower or an SSV self-supporting tower can support an antenna having 8 sq.ft. of equivalent flat-plate area in 90-mph wind, at the top of a 70-ft. t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00969.html (8,100 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:59:38 EDT
In 25 words or less? You can gather the steel costs yourself - check Texas Towers or other Rohn dealers. In general, the cost for the guyed system will be less - less excavation, less concrete, less
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00970.html (8,685 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:04:34 EDT
Don't forget that Rohn isn't the only manufacturer of self-supporting towers. They tend to be on the relatively expensive side whereas the Trylon Titan and AN Wireless versions are less expensive for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00971.html (8,254 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 07:55:15 -0600
Why don't you call Texas Towers, get the prices for ALL of the material you would need and add it up YOURSELF? (Actually, I expect Texas Towers would even add it up for you). Then call a professional
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00972.html (9,071 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:06:17 -0400
That's exactly what I'll do if it's not going to waste those folks' time. All I asked for here was an _estimate_. I expected that among Towertalk subscribers there'd be folks who could give me estima
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00973.html (8,610 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:15:59 -0400
I'd already done that. The difference in steel cost is not significant. The _erection_ of a 70-ft. SSV tower is what worries me. I know that a guyed system is cheaper, but by how much? $3k, $30k, or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00974.html (8,949 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: steve@oakcom.com (Steve Maki)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:57:02 -0400
Depends. If you are willing to assemble it yourself (on the ground), and your lot permits access to a small crane, it might not be any more expensive. A crane would be in and out of there in an hour
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00976.html (9,329 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:06:21 -0700
I will probably get flamed for this, but I can't resist. Aren't those Rohn specs for 45G super conservative (8sq ft at 90 MPH) because they place the top set of guys so far below the top of the tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00977.html (11,798 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:50:48 -0400
Indeed, Rohn's documentation for the 45G and 90 mph (Dwg. no. C870478 R1) shows the upper guys for a 70-ft. tower attached at 61 ft. The antenna area spec's given in this dwg are 9.1 sq.ft. for an eq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00979.html (8,655 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu