Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+webcam\s+atop\s+the\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+webcam\s+atop\s+the\s+tower\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] webcam atop the tower (score: 1): Author: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:08 -0600; In my case, the cam is too far to bother the 802-11b network, but the hub really messes the picture. I agree with the obnoxious ads, but they have never spammed me, and they have good prices and good; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00430.html (8,373 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] webcam atop the tower (score: 1): Author: Didier Juges <didier@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:37 -0600; Michael, I have one, similar to what you describe, near the top of my 50' tower (under the 2m beam). Make sure it is oriented such that the sun will not get into the picture. That would be assured de; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00431.html (8,996 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] webcam atop the tower (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:12:39 -0000; Hmm. When I was working for RCA Broadcast as a television camera field engineer I would deliberately point our CCD cameras into the sun to show potential customers that no harm would come. Vidicon ca; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00451.html (8,449 bytes)
4. RE: [TowerTalk] webcam atop the tower (score: 1): Author: "Michael Hatzakis" <mike@hatzakis.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 10:09:04 -0800; Thanks. So far, I've got five X10 cameras and other X10 stuff. Except for the annoying ads, they are great. I have their e-mail filtered into an X-10 mailbox and delete it. Once in a while, they have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00018.html (9,317 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]