Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tuneable\,\s+stackable\,\s+programmable\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tuneable\,\s+stackable\,\s+programmable\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] tuneable, stackable, programmable.... (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:45:11 -0500; Jim, W6RMK, raised the question of the k9ltc array being fully programmable. In turn, this raises the broader question of stacking smaller arrays, and tuning the individual elements, rather than phas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00554.html (7,579 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] tuneable, stackable, programmable.... (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:33:57 -0500; Jim, While you're at it, how about 3 across? You could "hang" them from a crossbar with mast extended down to mount each boom. They you could support them with guys from above on the crossbar. I woul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00559.html (9,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]