- 1. [TowerTalk] tower legislation (score: 1)
- Author: wklinn@hotmail.com (Wally Klinger)
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 15:09:25 PDT
- Good Afternoon, I saw a few weeks ago that somewhere in the southern states there was an administrative law ruling regarding placement of towers versus adjacent property values. It went something lik
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00887.html (7,703 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] tower legislation (score: 1)
- Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 00:05:46 EDT
- Try the TowerTalk archives at www.contesting.com. The guys on the Ham-Law reflector are the keepers of this information. Send a message to listserver@altlaw.com with <subscribe ham-law> in the body.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00899.html (7,397 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] tower legislation (score: 1)
- Author: JimW9WU@aol.com (JimW9WU@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:32:49 EDT
- Wally: I represented the Northbrook hams in passing the village tower ordinance. You don't need to show your neighbor anything, but there have been a number of studies showing that cellular towers ha
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00916.html (8,759 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] tower legislation (score: 1)
- Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan Griffiths)
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 00:55:25 -0400 (EDT)
- Hi Wally, Let's assume he is right. (I know he's wrong, but he thinks he's right, or he's just giving you a bad time about your tower.) Anyway, unless he has his house listed for sale right now, the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg01031.html (8,608 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu