Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tic\s+ring\s+in\s+tandem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+tic\s+ring\s+in\s+tandem\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 20:38:31 -0400; Has anyone used the db9 port on the back of the tic ring rotator controller to slave two tic ring rotators? I have one up and a second would be far less money than converting the tower to become a ro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00097.html (6,884 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: Tim Duffy K3LR <k3lr@k3lr.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 20:03:06 -0500; Hi Bob! I have given some thought to this in the past. One suggestion would be to set both rings (mounted on the tower) to the clockwise stop (180 degrees south by east). Use the pot wires from only; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00098.html (8,289 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:54:43 -0700; set both rings (mounted on the tower) to the clockwise stop (180 degrees south by east). Use the pot wires from only one ring, but parallel the motor wires for both rings. Now both rings will rotate; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00099.html (8,016 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: <kk9a@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 04:42:51 -0000; There is no clockwise stop on the rotor and if you create a hard stop you'll likely strip the plastic gear inside the motor gearbox. If K3LR's suggestion is to have a chance of working, you would nee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00101.html (10,216 bytes)
5. RE: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 09:13:31 -0500; This does not sound like a good solution to me. Why not call TIC for a recommendation? They are always very helpful to me. Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mail; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00105.html (10,052 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 22:40:12 -0700; Probably the easiest thing to do would be to use two ring rotator control boxes with a common set of external double pole CW/CCW switches wired in parallel with the individual CW/CCW switches in each; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00106.html (13,078 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: Roger D Johnson <n1rj@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:18:29 -0400; Keith Dutson wrote: This does not sound like a good solution to me. Why not call TIC for a recommendation? They are always very helpful to me. Keith NM5G How about a simple DC servo system. A compara; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00107.html (8,588 bytes)
8. RE: [TowerTalk] tic ring in tandem (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:25:33 -0000; The boxes I have for my 1022 rings could probably be synced pretty easily since they follow the setting of the front panel pot. Just have to do something like wire the two boxes to both follow one bo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00109.html (9,954 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]