Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+thoughts\s+aboutproperty\s+layout\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: rbigg@seii.net (rb)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 12:44:50 -0700
I went through the same analysis and also don't see much concern about metal objects coming into contact with triplex 240v service drops. I actually saw some guys putting up a tv antenna mast one tim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00580.html (8,394 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: k0xm@kc.rr.com (Chuck Kraly)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 15:32:39 -0500
OK, I've watched this thread long enuf. 1st my qualifications: 21yrs. with the Board of Public Utilities in Kansas City, Kansas. One rule to remember: ALL LINES CAN BE DEADLY!!! Now, lets assume the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00584.html (9,593 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: WD4K@bellsouth.net (WD4K)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:57:58 -0600
Well said-seems like some of us suggested this 20 messages ago. Sometimes you just don't know--An example: Three days ago some of my subcontractors were working in a historic home we are restoring. A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00587.html (11,569 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 18:16:52 -0400
First, I assume we would always call the local utility company and ask them if the lines are service drops if we don't know how to identify them. That rule includes extension cords, and the cords on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00591.html (12,770 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 18:32:00 -0400
OK, let's take a deep breath. Tom's probably right on the merits, but would anyone be surprised if locally-enforced building codes generally err in the direction of prohibiting antennas above or towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00592.html (8,578 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:03:30 -0400
I asked that question, but no one seemed to know. Locally, there are no codes at all except you have to be 15 feet clear of primary lines. Personal opinions aside, what are the local codes? 73, Tom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00594.html (8,802 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 20:50:04 -0400
Excellent question, and I'll be asking here tomorrow. The primary lines business is right on target, though .. hereabouts, they run >7 KV, and the induced voltage in the near field is enough that I h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00597.html (8,809 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] thoughts aboutproperty layout (score: 1)
Author: k1mk@arrl.net (Michael Keane, K1MK)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 00:13:08 -0400
That depends on the locality, of course. As a general point of reference the BOCA Model Code (this is the basis for the building codes in most states in New England, Mid-Atlantic & Mid-West (roughly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00621.html (9,471 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu