Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+surge\s+supression\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+surge\s+supression\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Surge supression (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:53:32 +0000; <<<The [surge supressor] in the station should be grounded to the single point station ground panel, as well as to the home safety ground.>>> This sounds like a great way to turn your house wiring dc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00205.html (7,231 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] surge supression (score: 1): Author: "Gene Bigham" <jbigham2@kc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:02:58 -0600; I have seen others state that connecting in the house mains ground to the RF ground is bad idea due to the difference in potential different places in the circuit end up being in case of a lightening; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00207.html (7,008 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] surge supression (score: 1): Author: Alan Beagley <ab2os@optonline.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:22:53 -0500; ISTR reading that *all* grounds must be connected together (according to the National Electrical Code). Alan AB2OS On 11/07/03 11:02 am Gene Bigham put fingers to keyboard and launched the following; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00219.html (7,642 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] surge supression (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 12:04:27 -0800; At 02:22 PM 11/7/2003 -0500, Alan Beagley wrote: ISTR reading that *all* grounds must be connected together (according to the National Electrical Code). Safety grounds yes, but not signal common poin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00220.html (9,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]