Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+shorty\s+40\s+vs\s+vertical\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] shorty 40 vs vertical (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 15:08:09 +0000 (GMT)
In all the descriptions, we only read that the shorty 40 is at X feet. What else is on the tower and more importantly, HOW CLOSE? If there is "other stuff" on the tower, have you tried removing the o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00009.html (7,166 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] shorty 40 vs vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Haavisto" <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:16:03 -0500
One thing that is interesting is the height of the antenna - moving the shorty 40 higher seems to play an important role in how well it performs. Will have to see if I can get mine a bit higher this
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00014.html (8,416 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] shorty 40 vs vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Chet Moore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:42:51 -0500
For East Coast contesters HFTA says to get the antenna 70- 80 feet for EU which is "where the volume is" but you need to run HFTA for your own individual QTH. Best height for mid america and west coa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00016.html (9,479 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu