Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+remote\s+stations\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 09:41:09 -0700
This whole thing is quite fascinating, and has, of course been standard practice in the commercial world for decades, as well as for repeaters. It's certainly attractive. However, it's vaguely unsett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00617.html (10,879 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Kellow, W5LT" <W5LT@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:39:41 -0500
Facinating topic, but doesn't it take a special, or at least a very modern HF radio (and antenna(s)) to do this? How would one 'tweak' the notch, or the APF tuning, or others of the myriad of control
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00626.html (11,243 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:09:58 -0400
Many, if not most of today's tranceivers will work with an audio interface between them and a computer. With the proper software and knowing the control codes you can control most any function on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00628.html (13,874 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:04:40 -0700
That's precisely the problem, today. The radios are built to have the op sitting in front of them. There are some radios suited for remote ops (e.g. the no longer available Kachina) and some of the T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00629.html (11,982 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:12:17 -0700
Boy, that sounds exciting doesn't it. I could only imagine sitting here in Coos Bay Oregon and using the antennas at EA8BH. Can you imagine that as an eBay auction? 73 Tom W7WHY _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00630.html (8,696 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Thorne" <rmthorne@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:27:48 -0500
This is a problem but several of the more common rigs that folks have work excellent for remote rigs: The TS-2000 and TS-480 rigs are excellent rigs for remote control. Just about all the features ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00631.html (15,391 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 13:28:23 -0700
Mrs. Tope!! BTW, in this particular case, remote operation would offer one more advantage - it would put me hundreds of miles from the rotten egg smell the permeates the Salton Sea :):) 73 de Mike, W
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00632.html (9,772 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "WA3GIN at King George" <wa3gin@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:22:17 -0400
Go to www.w4mq.com get the software free and plenty of details to read about the synergy between Radio and the Internet. 73, dave wa3gin _______________________________________________ See: http://ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00633.html (13,919 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "WA3GIN at King George" <wa3gin@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:25:37 -0400
The Kenwood TS-480 comes with free Internet Remote software that provide FULL FUNCTION of the radio, including VOIP for the audio. I run two Internet Remote Stations one on a dial-up 50 miles south o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00635.html (14,756 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Larry Phipps <larry@telepostinc.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 18:22:34 -0400
I have been running a remote station for over three years. I use a private connection, and it is not intended for anyone else to use. There is enough interest that QST has run several articles about
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00637.html (14,551 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:35:56 -0400
Can someone discuss the complications of implementing something like this in a high lightning area like central Florida? Despite full PolyPhaser protection I still like to physically disconnect the r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00639.html (10,990 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu