Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rebar\s+$was\s+900\s+MHz\s+tower$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+rebar\s+$was\s+900\s+MHz\s+tower$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] rebar (was 900 MHz tower) (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:32:45 -0800; Concrete has no real tension strength, so the rebar provides the needed tension strength. If your tower is a guyed tower with only compression loads on the big block o'concrete, you're right, the reb; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00646.html (9,020 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] rebar (was 900 MHz tower) (score: 1): Author: "John Blalock" <john@blalock.us>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:55:32 -0700; Jim, Universal Towers in their instructions for their free-standing aluminum towers states that rebar is not needed for their concrete bases. Should I put in rebar anyway? 73, -john, W7AAY __________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00662.html (10,663 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] rebar (was 900 MHz tower) (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:57:23 -0800; WHy not follow the mfrs instructions? Presumably, they've figured out the loads, and they know what's best. OTOH, rebar probably wouldn't hurt. If you're in a place where the bldg dept is going to se; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00663.html (9,404 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]